Something like that. That's a good call. But we shouldn't be stressing that Ubuntu isn't good because it's not 100% free. We should be stressing that Vista is bad and has no freedom to it.
Jacob > >> This is getting ridiculous. While Ubuntu is better than Vista, in my >> opinion, Ubuntu is not entirely free, and, consequently, not able to be >> supported by us because we are part of the FSF and we utilize their >> servers for our site. WE CAN ONLY SUPPORT 100% FREE BECAUSE WE FALL >> UNDER >> THE FSF. I don't know why I'm trying to stress these points anymore. >> >> Jacob >> > > Yes Yes. I get what you mean. We cannot label it "FSF Certified" because > it isn't totally free. However, I don't think we mean to say "NO UBUNTU IN > THE COMMUNITY" but instead, "FSF doesn't recommend it". > > I suggest we close this thread and rename it "Can we support 99% Free > Distro?", putting an arrow on Ubuntu isn't good =) > > --- > Lam YongXian > Adolflam.com > > FSF member #5279 > > > > _______________________________________________ > Advocate mailing list > [email protected] > http://badvista.fsf.org/mailman/listinfo/advocate > _______________________________________________ Advocate mailing list [email protected] http://badvista.fsf.org/mailman/listinfo/advocate
