Is mark the essence of a style of each artist?
On Jun 25, 2009, at 8:51 PM, William Conger wrote:
Now what sort of a cross is that, Cheerskep?
I think Miller had a workable definition of mark.
wc
--- On Thu, 6/25/09, [email protected] <[email protected]> wrote:
From: [email protected] <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: marks
To: [email protected]
Date: Thursday, June 25, 2009, 9:59 PM
During my sabbatical from the forum,
I dearly hope I missed it, but I
suspect I did not: the forum can go on for days ostensibly
discussing something
they call call "marks", without anyone bothering to
describe in detail their
notion of -- give what they think of as a "definition" of
-- "marks".
This is characteristic of groups that love to bask in the
undefined
mystical. Artists specialize in this.
Press them to say precisely what they have
in mind with "art", "meaning", "signifies". "represents",
etc. and they
recoil like vampires from a cross. (Colorful, no? But in
some basic way a valid
accusation.)
**************
Make your summer sizzle with fast and easy
recipes for the grill.
(http://food.aol.com/grilling?ncid=emlcntusfood00000006)
