Only one element of style. Boris Shoshensky ---------- Original Message ---------- From: armando baeza <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Cc: armando baeza <[email protected]> Subject: Re: marks Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2009 22:49:18 -0700
Is mark the essence of a style of each artist? On Jun 25, 2009, at 8:51 PM, William Conger wrote: > Now what sort of a cross is that, Cheerskep? > > I think Miller had a workable definition of mark. > wc > > --- On Thu, 6/25/09, [email protected] <[email protected]> wrote: > >> From: [email protected] <[email protected]> >> Subject: Re: marks >> To: [email protected] >> Date: Thursday, June 25, 2009, 9:59 PM >> During my sabbatical from the forum, >> I dearly hope I missed it, but I >> suspect I did not: the forum can go on for days ostensibly >> discussing something >> they call call "marks", without anyone bothering to >> describe in detail their >> notion of -- give what they think of as a "definition" of >> -- "marks". >> >> This is characteristic of groups that love to bask in the >> undefined >> mystical. Artists specialize in this. >> Press them to say precisely what they have >> in mind with "art", "meaning", "signifies". "represents", >> etc. and they >> recoil like vampires from a cross. (Colorful, no? But in >> some basic way a valid >> accusation.) >> >> >> ************** >> Make your summer sizzle with fast and easy >> recipes for the grill. > (http://food.aol.com/grilling?ncid=emlcntusfood00000006) ____________________________________________________________ Save on Criminal Lawyer Services. Click Now! http://thirdpartyoffers.netzero.net/TGL2241/fc/BLSrjpYbd6ur2HFt7vx1mDwkfpV8vL mF3DcNaaFSdEJRVMtKRXNDYyfyV12/
