By hand work,I mean what ever one individual does with his personal skill
art- music,poetry,etc..
I'm not referring to machine made objects that are designed and
rigidly controlled by the designers.
And it's not the medium or concept approach that I'm concerned about.
that william refers to, i do both at times, but I have not placed a Michael
Angelo upside down,and call it "my art " , not yet anyway.
Im referring to the fairness of those who do very realistic work without
any skill in the doing of it, and selling it "as their work' to serious buyers
who lack awareness. In spanish we call it, Venta de "Gato por Liebre",,
selling a  "cat for a hare".
mando

On Sep 29, 2009, at 2:03 PM, [email protected] wrote:

In a message dated 9/29/09 4:41:55 PM, [email protected] writes:


If you say the quality is in the object and if you require handiwork to
produce that quality then your judgment is justified.


If you require handwork to produce an object which you can then call art,
then you are justified in your judgment inasmuch as your judgment is
confirmed by your culture. Handwork is not an attribute of all art- music,
plays,
poetry - therefore it is not a universal attribute of art.I agree with mando about the computer generated sculpture but not that anything machine made is
not art.
KAte Sullivan

Reply via email to