On Aug 1, 2010, at 5:47 PM, [email protected] wrote:

> There is indeed. It is broader than what is that called or named. You are
> just as likely to get an explanation of what the thing is used for as you
are
> to find out what to call it. When trying to learn something very
> simple,like   how to say spoon using German,it is disconcerting to have
someone
> dmonstrate how to use a spoon. "Namen" works better. Presumably this
difference is
> what Wittgenstein intended to be understood?

You mean, it's ... um ... what's that f-word? Oh yes, it's fuzzy! What a
notion!




| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Michael Brady

Reply via email to