How about rippling water sound, thunder,farts, crying? ab
________________________________ From: Frances Kelly <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Sent: Tue, February 8, 2011 11:21:17 AM Subject: RE: Signs of Signs of Signs Frances to Armando and listers... You asked how the sound of musical form is communicated. This is asked presumably within the framework of the integration theory of communication. Since communicators therein must be mature human linguists and any information must be only in the form of language signs, then the sounds heard as musical forms would seemingly be interpreted into statements to be thought about or talked about. In other words, meaning must be read into musical sounds as if an expressed discourse were stated by a reviewer. Otherwise, the exchange and contact and accord of musical form is likely heard, but is not communicated nor by signs, which signs must be language signs. Anything outside of linguistic verbal language is not able to be communicated or to be a sign. This is my take so far on the Harris theory as applied to nonlingual haze or stuff that is shared.
