Presumably that was Joe Berg who felt he was kindly saving our time from bothering with Hegel on account Hegel thought Antigone was the beat work of art there was and there was a lesson in it. Or whoever. I would appreciate it if no one tried to save time in this way. If we have none of us read Hegel, except predictably Conger,(whose great great grandfather knew Hegel well) perhaps we could read whatever part is applicable and stop wasting time. Kate Sullivan, -----Original Message----- From: Cheerskep <[email protected]> To: aesthetics-l <[email protected]> Sent: Sun, Jul 1, 2012 4:35 pm Subject: Re: Hegel
-----Original Message----- From: Cheerskep <[email protected]> To: aesthetics-l <[email protected]> Sent: Sun, Jul 1, 2012 4:35 pm Subject: Re: Hegel In a message dated 7/1/12 3:26:32 PM, [email protected] writes:
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/arts/books-and-media/book-reviews/antigonick-b
y-anne-carson/article4363942/ The space after 'b' is a mistake. The correct5 url is
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/arts/books-and-media/book-reviews/antigonick-b y-anne-carson/article 4363942/ To save lister's time: Hegel praises ANTIGONE as the best work of art there was. Presumably this was because Hegel saw in it reflections of the Germany of his time, and the need to follow conscience even when it contradicts the King. I personally have never found the "lesson" of any work of art to be part of what gives me an "aesthetic experience".
