I have only been at one site.  It had a 60’ dish on the tower that was grinding 
around about 60 rpm inside a radome.  Made quite a noise.  Inside the 
transmitter shack it has the frequency listed.  Seemingly out to a decimal 
point or two.  I did not get the impression it was frequency agile.  I think 
the antenna had 60 dB gain.  The tx power was in the kW range.  

From: Ken Hohhof 
Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2019 11:36 AM
To: 'AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group' 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] dumb DFS questions

Chicago has 2 TDWRs (for OHare and Midway) and both are in the 5600-5650 MHz 
band.  I think a lot of WISP equipment actually locks out those frequencies, 
and the only place a WISP would be desperate enough to use that 50 MHz 
apparently is Puerto Rico, which is apparently the Wild West of spectrum.

 

http://www.wispa.org/Resources/Industry-Resources/TDWR-Resources/TDWR-Locations-and-Frequencies

 

 

 

From: AF <af-boun...@af.afmug.com> On Behalf Of ch...@wbmfg.com
Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2019 12:16 PM
To: 'AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group' <af@af.afmug.com>
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] dumb DFS questions

 

Those radars sweep the sky pretty slowly.  Like 60 rpm.  It would be 
theoretically possible to be on their frequency and just blank TX when it is 
looking your way.  You could extract timing sync from the radar sweep and 
figure out when to blank.  Their gain is such that you would only have to blank 
for perhaps 50 mS.  

 

If I had more ambition I would ask for an experimental license to play with the 
idea.  

 

From: Ken Hohhof 

Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2019 11:11 AM

To: 'AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group' 

Subject: Re: [AFMUG] dumb DFS questions

 

Only the APs, at least under FCC rules, I’m not sure about the rest of the 
world.

 

That alone IMHO says DFS is a joke, or regulatory “experts” deluding 
themselves.  If I have a sector pointed away from some government radar, it 
won’t detect the radar, but the SMs are pointed back at the radar and are not 
required to have a detection mechanism.  Probably a good point that it would be 
too complicated for one SM to detect radar and then communicate with the AP to 
request a channel change.  But you really need something like a SAS for this 
spectrum sharing idea to work.

 

 

From: AF <af-boun...@af.afmug.com> On Behalf Of Kurt Fankhauser
Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2019 12:04 PM
To: AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group <af@af.afmug.com>
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] dumb DFS questions

 

one thing i have always wondered is do the SM's actually look for RADAR or only 
the AP's?

 

On Thu, Nov 21, 2019 at 12:55 PM Ken Hohhof <af...@kwisp.com> wrote:

  Yes, that’s true, but a higher gain antenna at the SM end helps rcv but not 
xmt.  And SMàAP is the direction you may actually need a better signal because 
the AP likely has a sector antenna and is mounted higher so it sees more 
interference.

   

  It would not be unusual to have a 16 dBi antenna at the AP but a 25 dBi 
antenna at the SM.  The antenna gain would help the rcv signal at the SM, but 
it would probably have to lower its conducted power by 9 dB to stay within the 
regulatory EIRP limit.

   

  In contrast, in U-NII-3 the CPE end is treated as point-to-point and can use 
antenna gain to exceed the AP limit of 36 dBm EIRP (subject to OOBE limits).

   

  From: AF <af-boun...@af.afmug.com> On Behalf Of Adam Moffett
  Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2019 11:27 AM
  To: af@af.afmug.com
  Subject: Re: [AFMUG] dumb DFS questions

   

  There might be something I don't understand, but I thought you had flat EIRP 
limit of +30dbm whether it's an SM or an AP.

  On 11/21/2019 12:11 PM, castarritt . wrote:

    6 dBm loss for the AP transmit isn't the end of the world.  It's the up to 
23 dBm loss on the SM transmit power that destroys the usefulness of DFS for 
PTMP past a couple miles.  The ~16 dBi gain 90° sectors 2-300' up in the air 
just can't hear those SMs over all the noise they are picking up.  What we need 
is the ability to run downlink on DFS and uplink on 5.2 or 5.8.

     

     

    On Thu, Nov 21, 2019 at 10:56 AM Adam Moffett <dmmoff...@gmail.com> wrote:

      Yeah I think on most equipment you can set alternate channels that are 
just shifted over 5mhz from where you were.  And yeah I think the channel needs 
to be clear for a few minutes before you can go back to it.

      Assuming you don't really have a TDWR near you, I don't think DFS events 
are that big of a deal.  My understanding is that DFS events are more likely if 
you lie to the software about antenna gain to cheat the EIRP limit.  False 
detects happen, but I don't think it's a daily event.  Disclaimer: I've mostly 
used it on Point to point with dishes.  I'm not sure if you'd pick up more 
anomolies on a sector antenna.

      The biggest bummer is the EIRP limit.  When you're trying to get that 32 
SNR for the 256QAM then losing 6db kind of hurts.  Or when you've already got 
someone hooked up 10 miles away and lowering the power ruins them.  

      Where you really want to use DFS (In my opinion) is at a site where you 
have a bunch of customers within 1-2 miles.  Unfortunately I don't have sites 
like that.

      -Adam

       

       

      On 11/21/2019 11:31 AM, Ken Hohhof wrote:

        We mostly avoid DFS frequencies on APs because of the impact if we get 
false radar detects.  Also we are mostly a Cambium shop.  So I’m a bit confused 
about DFS on other vendor equipment like Ubiquiti as well as home routers.

         

        Question 1 – what happens when there’s a DFS detection?  On the Cambium 
gear, we have to select 1 or 2 alternate frequencies.  But on other gear, I 
don’t see this.  When there’s a DFS hit, does it jump to another random 
frequency?  Does it rescan the current frequency until it tests clear and only 
then resume transmission?  Is the answer right in front of me and I’m being 
stupid?  Maybe in the case of routers they are exempt because of low EIRP?

         

        Question 2 – what about 40/80/160 MHz channels?  We have a competitor 
using Ubiquiti gear and advertising residential subscriber speed plans up to 
100x100.  Clearly they must be using at least 40 MHz channels if not 80 MHz, or 
else their marketing people have burning pants and long noses.  And I don’t see 
how a WISP, especially one surrounded by other WISPs, could use wide channels 
other than in DFS bands.  We have some PTP links using 40 MHz but only 10 and 
20 MHz channels on our APs.  So assuming you are using 40 or 80 MHz in DFS, 
what happens when there’s a DFS detect?  Does the whole 40 or 80 MHz have to 
find a new home?  Can it slide over 2.5 or 5 MHz and substantially overlap the 
previous occupied spectrum?  DFS bands come with enough spectrum to use wide 
channels, but is there enough to jump around when you take a DFS hit?

         

      -- 
      AF mailing list
      AF@af.afmug.com
      http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

     

  -- 
  AF mailing list
  AF@af.afmug.com
  http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-- 
AF mailing list
AF@af.afmug.com
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-- 
AF mailing list
AF@af.afmug.com
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
-- 
AF mailing list
AF@af.afmug.com
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

Reply via email to