The 3000 has an SFP, the 3000L does not.

On Wed, Jan 22, 2020 at 5:54 PM Ryan Ray <ryan...@gmail.com> wrote:

> It’s got an sfp in it
>
> On Wed, Jan 22, 2020 at 1:57 PM Adam Moffett <dmmoff...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Copper.  3000L doesn't have fiber.
>> On 1/22/2020 4:55 PM, Nate Burke wrote:
>>
>> Are you seeing Ethernet problems with fiber connections as well, or just
>> the copper?  We put up an EPMP 3000 early last year.  It had Ethernet
>> problems for about the first 3 or 4 weeks of putting it up, but has seemed
>> fine since then.  This was on Copper connection.  I was just having
>> Ethernet problems in general, 1g, 100m, 10m.  It would instantly negotiate
>> the speed, but have lots of packet loss.  I attributed it to corrosion on
>> the Cat5 pins that summer temperature fluctuations cleared up.
>>
>>
>> On 1/22/2020 2:45 PM, Adam Moffett wrote:
>>
>> It was 1 link at 0.9 mile on a +30 EIRP DFS band.
>>
>> Just a test.  Test failed.
>>
>>
>> On 1/22/2020 3:41 PM, Ryan Ray wrote:
>>
>> Technically you wouldn't see any performance gains over a 2000 unless
>> you're hitting 256qam.
>>
>> What's the distance of the links?
>>
>> On Wed, Jan 22, 2020 at 11:19 AM Matt Hoppes <
>> mattli...@rivervalleyinternet.net> wrote:
>>
>>> No but Chris and I had a theory it was hot heat related... that kills
>>> that theory.
>>>
>>> On 1/22/20 1:17 PM, Adam Moffett wrote:
>>> > Binghamton, NY just north of you.  Usually in the 30's this time of
>>> > year, but it's been more like in the teens for several days.
>>> >
>>> > Did you see a temperature correlation?
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > On 1/22/2020 12:49 PM, Matt Hoppes wrote:
>>> >> I purchased a bunch of ePMP3000 (not L) and have honestly had nothing
>>> >> but issues with them since trying to deploy... including multiple
>>> >> instances at multiple sites with the inability to get Gig to link...
>>> >> but at the office it's fine... swap to a Ubiquiti AC radio and it's a
>>> >> Gig on the tower.
>>> >>
>>> >> Out of curiosity what temperature are you at wherever you are right
>>> now?
>>> >>
>>> >> On 1/22/20 12:46 PM, Adam Moffett wrote:
>>> >>> On the first unit we tried yeah.  GigE worked in the office, but on
>>> >>> the tower it would only run at 100BaseT.  Our guys fought with it
>>> for
>>> >>> a couple of days. Brought it back to the office and it did a gig in
>>> >>> the office no problem.  I assume it's related to the cable length,
>>> >>> but maybe some other factor matters.  The switch at the tower was a
>>> >>> Mikrotik CRS 2xx of some type.  Not sure if that matters.
>>> >>>
>>> >>> In any case, the second unit we plugged in at the tower went right
>>> to
>>> >>> a gig no problem.....except that one died today after being in the
>>> >>> air for 4 days.
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Maybe I just rolled snake eyes or something, but it has me wondering
>>> >>> about reliability.
>>> >>>
>>> >>> The price and feature set is right so I had big plans for these. I
>>> >>> probably won't try them again unless something changes.
>>> >>>
>>> >>> -Adam
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>> On 1/22/2020 12:39 PM, Matt Hoppes wrote:
>>> >>>> WAIT WAIT WAIT.... You ALSO are having issues linking at Gigabit?
>>> >>>> That's interesting, because myself and someone else are also having
>>> >>>> this issue and Cambium has sworn until they are blue in the face
>>> >>>> there is no issue.
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> On 1/22/20 11:54 AM, Adam Moffett wrote:
>>> >>>>> So I tried an ePMP 3000L.
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>> Real world performance is ultimately about the same as ePMP 2000.
>>> >>>>> QoS doesn't work properly.  SM was re registering with a pretty
>>> >>>>> minimal amount of noise.  I had 27 DL SNR and 17 UL SNR on a DFS
>>> >>>>> band......it's not going to get a lot better than that where I am.
>>> >>>>> Not in real life anyway.
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>> First AP wouldn't link at 1Gig on a long cable (but would on a
>>> >>>>> short cable).  Tried a second AP and that one worked at 1Gig, but
>>> >>>>> then died 4 days later.
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>> I got a lot of mileage out of the ePMP 2000 and the PMP450, but
>>> >>>>> this new product does not currently impress.   It's sort of a
>>> >>>>> little bit shitty in fact.
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>> Maybe they'll bake out some of the issues later.
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> AF mailing list
>>> AF@af.afmug.com
>>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> AF mailing list
>> AF@af.afmug.com
>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>>
> --
> AF mailing list
> AF@af.afmug.com
> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>
-- 
AF mailing list
AF@af.afmug.com
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

Reply via email to