We don't peer specifically. We choose data centers like INAP and Equinix that have lots of customers located in their centers and large peering fabrics built. I think of peering as more of a BGP thing, which I am more concerned about consistent low latency between my switch platform and my customers. I wouldn't be against peering, I just don't know that it would be a huge benefit.
SIP trunks are a pretty simple deal. Maybe they aren't set up to deal with any more complexity. We use Fusion right now at the Dallas Equinix. So we get their BGP routes and blended DIA. In that case, you would peer with them. We have a similar arrangement in Seattle. On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 12:55 PM Seth Mattinen <se...@rollernet.us> wrote: > On 10/22/20 10:45 AM, Mike Hammett wrote: > > Well yes, mine, but also any that my customers may use independently of > me. > > > > Also, like me, Seth runs an IX. We're always trying to find networks > > that would benefit from IXes. VoIP providers would be an obvious one, > > but many of them don't seem to know how to run networks. > > > > I'm also looking at options for SIP trunks for my office, and I would > really prefer to buy with someone who participates in peering, not just > says how great their network is then when I try to find out details on > what exactly that means come up with little to nothing. > > -- > AF mailing list > AF@af.afmug.com > http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com > -- Lewis Bergman 325-439-0533 Cell
-- AF mailing list AF@af.afmug.com http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
