What do you mean "doesn't work well" at 30 MHz? Does the link not stay connected where it does in 40 MHz? You're clearly stepping over another link if so. Try a different center frequency.
On Fri, Feb 18, 2022 at 8:01 PM Jaime Solorza <losguyswirel...@gmail.com> wrote: > At 16.5 miles thirty Mhz doesn't work well...I have tried both ptp...might > go back to it... > I am the installer not the WISP owner...tomorrow I will make changes > > On Fri, Feb 18, 2022, 10:11 AM Josh Luthman <j...@imaginenetworksllc.com> > wrote: > >> So start by your ping test between radios and make sure it's the RF link >> (you do have to have both radios in the same IP subnet). >> >> I think those AC radios will tell you live modulation graphs, watch that >> for a bit. Bandwidth, too. >> >> What kind of bandwidth do you need? Doing 40 MHz wide is pretty wasteful >> and as said, you could be the source of your issues/interference - a 10/20 >> MHz would be more spectral efficient, give you a better signal, and could >> solve your problem. >> >> On Fri, Feb 18, 2022 at 11:27 AM Jaime Solorza <losguyswirel...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> Prism AC radios >>> >>> On Fri, Feb 18, 2022, 7:05 AM Josh Luthman <j...@imaginenetworksllc.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Can you ping FROM one radio TO another radio and make sure that's good >>>> or not? >>>> >>>> Could be bandwidth/usage. Could be an RF issue. Do you have a way to >>>> look at any of the RF stats? >>>> >>>> >5GHz link with excellent signal and noise floor >>>> >>>> If it's Ubnt don't believe that fake ass noise floor. Are you tracking >>>> the modulation by chance? It's probably not getting less than 6 ms because >>>> of the 802.11 product, but that's just a guess. >>>> >>>> On Thu, Feb 17, 2022 at 10:19 PM Jaime Solorza < >>>> losguyswirel...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> basically what i figured ,thx >>>>> Jaime Solorza >>>>> Wireless Systems Architect >>>>> 915-861-1390 >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Thu, Feb 17, 2022 at 7:47 PM Steve Jones <thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> narrower channel, better power density, less interference >>>>>> depends on throughput demand >>>>>> >>>>>> On Thu, Feb 17, 2022 at 8:43 PM Jaime Solorza < >>>>>> losguyswirel...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> We picked up a project for the Ft. Bliss Water which also handles >>>>>>> McGregor and Dona Ana Ranges... >>>>>>> Using MDS 900Mhz FHSS radios at 125kbps...ping times to all points, >>>>>>> even through repeaters 1-2ms pings average..when pulling data from >>>>>>> PLCs...they hit 2-4ms but then return to 1-2... >>>>>>> Have a 16.5 miles ptp 5GHz link with excellent signal and noise >>>>>>> floor...pings are 6-450ms and never below 6! Using 40Mhz wide channel... >>>>>>> What do you think is issue? Interference in the band? >>>>>>> Thx >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> AF mailing list >>>>>>> AF@af.afmug.com >>>>>>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >>>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> AF mailing list >>>>>> AF@af.afmug.com >>>>>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >>>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> AF mailing list >>>>> AF@af.afmug.com >>>>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >>>>> >>>> -- >>>> AF mailing list >>>> AF@af.afmug.com >>>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >>>> >>> -- >>> AF mailing list >>> AF@af.afmug.com >>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >>> >> -- >> AF mailing list >> AF@af.afmug.com >> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >> > -- > AF mailing list > AF@af.afmug.com > http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >
-- AF mailing list AF@af.afmug.com http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
