+1 what Steve said. Depending on the bandwidth you need, go to a narrower channel. 20 MHz, or if you can get the bandwidth you need, go to a 10 MHz channel.
bp
<part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>
On 2/17/2022 7:17 PM, Jaime Solorza
wrote:
basically what i figured ,thx
Jaime SolorzaWireless Systems Architect915-861-1390
On Thu, Feb 17, 2022 at 7:47 PM Steve Jones <thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> wrote:
narrower channel, better power density, less interferencedepends on throughput demand
--On Thu, Feb 17, 2022 at 8:43 PM Jaime Solorza <losguyswirel...@gmail.com> wrote:
We picked up a project for the Ft. Bliss Water which also handles McGregor and Dona Ana Ranges...--Using MDS 900Mhz FHSS radios at 125kbps...ping times to all points, even through repeaters 1-2ms pings average..when pulling data from PLCs...they hit 2-4ms but then return to 1-2...Have a 16.5 miles ptp 5GHz link with excellent signal and noise floor...pings are 6-450ms and never below 6! Using 40Mhz wide channel...What do you think is issue? Interference in the band?Thx
AF mailing list
AF@af.afmug.com
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
AF mailing list
AF@af.afmug.com
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
-- AF mailing list AF@af.afmug.com http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
