Here's a fun fact about the BDC and 477. In the BDC they want you to report subscription data (just like the 477) but they have a new tech code 71 for licensed wireless (that's anything in CBRS band or 2.5Ghz). However, the 477 subscription section will reject the subscription files with 71 in them. It's not as simple as changing the 71 to 70, because then you could create duplicate rows with the same speed tiers and tech codes. The funnest part is that NONE of the billing systems that spit out the subscription report can add the 71 in the right place. So while their report will pass (maybe) on the 477 it is worthless for BDC if you have any licensed band radios. And if you report any locations being served by licensed, and don't have any subscribers in your subscription file with tech code 71, they will not let you certify your filing. FUN TIMES!
On Fri, Aug 26, 2022 at 10:55 AM Seth Mattinen <se...@rollernet.us> wrote: > On 8/25/22 6:39 PM, Cameron Crum wrote: > > The primary goal is to determine consumer level broadband access. So > > yeah, they flag the commercial addresses and reject. It's a pretty easy > > search to eliminate them. Just ignore anything with bsl_flag set to > false. > > > Did the math this morning and the rejected location IDs account for 63% > of my customers. Here's to hoping they aren't looking for accuracy with > this new thing. > > -- > AF mailing list > AF@af.afmug.com > http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >
-- AF mailing list AF@af.afmug.com http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
