Easy. s/70/71
On Fri, Aug 26, 2022 at 12:14 PM Cameron Crum <cc...@murcevilo.com> wrote: > Here's a fun fact about the BDC and 477. In the BDC they want you to > report subscription data (just like the 477) but they have a new tech code > 71 for licensed wireless (that's anything in CBRS band or 2.5Ghz). However, > the 477 subscription section will reject the subscription files with 71 in > them. It's not as simple as changing the 71 to 70, because then you could > create duplicate rows with the same speed tiers and tech codes. The funnest > part is that NONE of the billing systems that spit out the subscription > report can add the 71 in the right place. So while their report will pass > (maybe) on the 477 it is worthless for BDC if you have any licensed band > radios. And if you report any locations being served by licensed, and don't > have any subscribers in your subscription file with tech code 71, they will > not let you certify your filing. FUN TIMES! > > > On Fri, Aug 26, 2022 at 10:55 AM Seth Mattinen <se...@rollernet.us> wrote: > >> On 8/25/22 6:39 PM, Cameron Crum wrote: >> > The primary goal is to determine consumer level broadband access. So >> > yeah, they flag the commercial addresses and reject. It's a pretty easy >> > search to eliminate them. Just ignore anything with bsl_flag set to >> false. >> >> >> Did the math this morning and the rejected location IDs account for 63% >> of my customers. Here's to hoping they aren't looking for accuracy with >> this new thing. >> >> -- >> AF mailing list >> AF@af.afmug.com >> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >> > -- > AF mailing list > AF@af.afmug.com > http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >
-- AF mailing list AF@af.afmug.com http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
