Looks good to me. But I did take a look at the message source and the actual true sender is not there like it used to be.

-----Original Message----- From: Paul McCall via Af
Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2014 8:02 AM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] LIST: Overnight adjustments

I googled it right after I clicked send. "Google is your friend" is what I always tell my guys :)

Chuck, in your opinion, is WLM acting normally or acceptably as far as the list is concerned ?

-----Original Message-----
From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Chuck McCown via Af
Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2014 9:56 AM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] LIST: Overnight adjustments

Windows Live Mail.  It was what replaced Outlook Express.
I like it for most things. But nothing is very good at gracefully handling my 40 GB mail archive.

-----Original Message-----
From: Paul McCall via Af
Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2014 7:53 AM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] LIST: Overnight adjustments

What is WLM ?

-----Original Message-----
From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Ken Hohhof via Af
Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2014 9:49 AM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] LIST: Overnight adjustments

Not sure what you mean by "displayed FROM field".

My email client (WLM) displays what's in the header, I would assume that's typical. What else would it display?

I was responding to your statement that the From address wasn't the sender on the old list either. It was.


-----Original Message----- From: Paul McCall via Af
Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2014 8:10 AM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] LIST: Overnight adjustments

Yes, I agree that was in the header.  I was referring to function (displayed
FROM field and the replied TO field).  Sorry if I wasn’t clear.  That was
part of a longer conversation that explained the context

-----Original Message-----
From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Ken Hohhof via Af
Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2014 9:06 AM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] LIST: Overnight adjustments

I looked at the headers of an email Bill sent via the old list and here is
the From: header:

From: Bill Prince <part...@skylinebroadbandservice.com>



-----Original Message-----
From: Paul McCall via Af
Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2014 10:14 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] LIST: Overnight adjustments

The From address  wasn’t the sender on the old list either.

However, the old list said did say something like this...   af@afmug.com; on
behalf of; Bill Prince <part...@skylinebroadbandservice.com>  in the from.

Whereas the new list doesn’t show the <part...@skylinebroadbandservice.com>.

For the moment, I believe that we will put that back in the body soon ...
like this... --- [ Bill Prince <part...@skylinebroadbandservice.com> wrote ]




-----Original Message-----
From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Mike Hammett via Af
Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2014 9:37 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] LIST: Overnight adjustments

I think he means that the From address isn't actually the sender of the
e-mail.




----- Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com



----- Original Message -----

From: "Paul McCall via Af" <af@afmug.com>
To: af@afmug.com
Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2014 6:53:09 PM
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] LIST: Overnight adjustments

Matt,

I looked at all the threads for the past few hours, and I see who it is
coming from each time.

However, it does not show their email address... we can add that back into
the body of the message I believe. That is how we had it yesterday, but the
upgrade "undid" that.

Thanks!

Paul

-----Original Message----- From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Matt Jenkins via Af
Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2014 6:24 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] LIST: Overnight adjustments

Unless you sign your name to the email, there isn't any way of seeing who
its from.


On 09/16/2014 03:15 PM, Ryan Ray via Af wrote:
Looks way better now. Thanks Paul


On Tuesday, September 16, 2014, Mike Hammett via Af <af@afmug.com> wrote:

*slow clap*




----- Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com



----- Original Message -----
From: "Curtis Brotherton via Af" <af@afmug.com <javascript:;>>
To: af@afmug.com <javascript:;>
Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2014 3:34:33 PM
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] LIST: Overnight adjustments

I have also fixed the annoying 'Reply To' issue, where it was replying to
the original poster AND the list.

It now only reply's to the list.
--
============================
Curtis Brotherton
PDMNet
(772) 564-6800





-----Original Message----- From: Jaime Solorza via Af <af@afmug.com <javascript:;><mailto:
jaime%20solorza%20via%20af%20%3...@afmug.com <javascript:;>%3e>>
Reply-to: <af@afmug.com <javascript:;>>
To: Animal Farm <af@afmug.com <javascript:;><mailto:
animal%20farm%20%3...@afmug.com <javascript:;>%3e>>, Paul McCall <
pa...@pdmnet.net
<javascript:;><mailto:paul%20mccall%20%3cpa...@pdmnet.net
<javascript:;>%3e>>
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] LIST: Overnight adjustments
Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2014 20:09:24 +0000



Thanks

Jaime Solorza
On Sep 16, 2014 6:43 AM, "Paul McCall via Af" <af@afmug.com
<javascript:;>
<mailto:af@afmug.com <javascript:;>>> wrote:

Guys,

We installed some updates in the middle of the night to fix the FROM
problem. There a couple tweaks that will be done today. My tech on the
project is now sleeping as we worked during the night.

PLEASE BE PATIENT.

Paul McCall, Pres.
PDMNet / Florida Broadband
658 Old Dixie Highway
Vero Beach, FL 32962
772-564-6800 office
772-473-0352 cell
www.pdmnet.com<http://www.pdmnet.com><http://www.pdmnet.com/>
pa...@pdmnet.net <javascript:;><mailto:pa...@pdmnet.net <javascript:;>
<mailto:pa...@pdmnet.net <javascript:;>>









Reply via email to