I'm using Windows mail from Windows Vista "hacked" for Windows 7. My mail archive is about there - 32.3 gig, dating back to when I became a WISP in 2004....
Of course i have 4 other businesses in my mail program too... ----- Original Message ----- From: Chuck McCown via Af To: af@afmug.com Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2014 8:55 AM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] LIST: Overnight adjustments Windows Live Mail. It was what replaced Outlook Express. I like it for most things. But nothing is very good at gracefully handling my 40 GB mail archive. -----Original Message----- From: Paul McCall via Af Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2014 7:53 AM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] LIST: Overnight adjustments What is WLM ? -----Original Message----- From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Ken Hohhof via Af Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2014 9:49 AM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] LIST: Overnight adjustments Not sure what you mean by "displayed FROM field". My email client (WLM) displays what's in the header, I would assume that's typical. What else would it display? I was responding to your statement that the From address wasn't the sender on the old list either. It was. -----Original Message----- From: Paul McCall via Af Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2014 8:10 AM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] LIST: Overnight adjustments Yes, I agree that was in the header. I was referring to function (displayed FROM field and the replied TO field). Sorry if I wasn’t clear. That was part of a longer conversation that explained the context -----Original Message----- From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Ken Hohhof via Af Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2014 9:06 AM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] LIST: Overnight adjustments I looked at the headers of an email Bill sent via the old list and here is the From: header: From: Bill Prince <part...@skylinebroadbandservice.com> -----Original Message----- From: Paul McCall via Af Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2014 10:14 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] LIST: Overnight adjustments The From address wasn’t the sender on the old list either. However, the old list said did say something like this... af@afmug.com; on behalf of; Bill Prince <part...@skylinebroadbandservice.com> in the from. Whereas the new list doesn’t show the <part...@skylinebroadbandservice.com>. For the moment, I believe that we will put that back in the body soon ... like this... --- [ Bill Prince <part...@skylinebroadbandservice.com> wrote ] -----Original Message----- From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Mike Hammett via Af Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2014 9:37 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] LIST: Overnight adjustments I think he means that the From address isn't actually the sender of the e-mail. ----- Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "Paul McCall via Af" <af@afmug.com> To: af@afmug.com Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2014 6:53:09 PM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] LIST: Overnight adjustments Matt, I looked at all the threads for the past few hours, and I see who it is coming from each time. However, it does not show their email address... we can add that back into the body of the message I believe. That is how we had it yesterday, but the upgrade "undid" that. Thanks! Paul -----Original Message----- From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Matt Jenkins via Af Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2014 6:24 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] LIST: Overnight adjustments Unless you sign your name to the email, there isn't any way of seeing who its from. On 09/16/2014 03:15 PM, Ryan Ray via Af wrote: > Looks way better now. Thanks Paul > > > On Tuesday, September 16, 2014, Mike Hammett via Af <af@afmug.com> wrote: > >> *slow clap* >> >> >> >> >> ----- >> Mike Hammett >> Intelligent Computing Solutions >> http://www.ics-il.com >> >> >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> >> From: "Curtis Brotherton via Af" <af@afmug.com <javascript:;>> >> To: af@afmug.com <javascript:;> >> Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2014 3:34:33 PM >> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] LIST: Overnight adjustments >> >> I have also fixed the annoying 'Reply To' issue, where it was replying to >> the original poster AND the list. >> >> It now only reply's to the list. >> -- >> ============================ >> Curtis Brotherton >> PDMNet >> (772) 564-6800 >> >> >> >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Jaime Solorza via Af <af@afmug.com <javascript:;><mailto: >> jaime%20solorza%20via%20af%20%3...@afmug.com <javascript:;>%3e>> >> Reply-to: <af@afmug.com <javascript:;>> >> To: Animal Farm <af@afmug.com <javascript:;><mailto: >> animal%20farm%20%3...@afmug.com <javascript:;>%3e>>, Paul McCall < >> pa...@pdmnet.net >> <javascript:;><mailto:paul%20mccall%20%3cpa...@pdmnet.net >> <javascript:;>%3e>> >> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] LIST: Overnight adjustments >> Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2014 20:09:24 +0000 >> >> >> >> Thanks >> >> Jaime Solorza >> On Sep 16, 2014 6:43 AM, "Paul McCall via Af" <af@afmug.com >> <javascript:;> >> <mailto:af@afmug.com <javascript:;>>> wrote: >> >>> Guys, >>> >>> We installed some updates in the middle of the night to fix the FROM >>> problem. There a couple tweaks that will be done today. My tech on the >>> project is now sleeping as we worked during the night. >>> >>> PLEASE BE PATIENT. >>> >>> Paul McCall, Pres. >>> PDMNet / Florida Broadband >>> 658 Old Dixie Highway >>> Vero Beach, FL 32962 >>> 772-564-6800 office >>> 772-473-0352 cell >>> www.pdmnet.com<http://www.pdmnet.com><http://www.pdmnet.com/> >>> pa...@pdmnet.net <javascript:;><mailto:pa...@pdmnet.net <javascript:;> >>> <mailto:pa...@pdmnet.net <javascript:;>> >>> >>> >> >> >
