Interesting no rants yet about disabling a feature to charge less.  Yet look at 
all the SKUs that Intel creates by disabling cores, disabling hyperthreading, 
disabling some of the cache, etc.  It feels OK to buy an inexpensive 4 core CPU 
until you find out it’s a 6 core chip with 2 cores disabled.  But if it’s 
cheaper for Intel than actually making different dies, what does it matter if 
the end result is the same?  I think it’s human nature, we’re happier not 
knowing some things.

From: Mike Hammett via Af 
Sent: Monday, November 24, 2014 9:53 AM
To: af@afmug.com 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ePMP Force

It is, but the sync ability is disabled.

I believe it has been incorrectly stated that GPS been disabled. The sync has 
been disabled. You can still get positioning and satellite tracking 
information...  I believe.




-----
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com





--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

From: "Gino Villarini via Af" <af@afmug.com>
To: "<af@afmug.com>" <af@afmug.com>
Sent: Monday, November 24, 2014 9:51:18 AM
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ePMP Force


I was under the impression that the force ptp was based on the AP module, hence 
the gigabit port..????

Gino A. Villarini 
@gvillarini



On Nov 24, 2014, at 10:09 AM, Sriram Chaturvedi via Af <af@afmug.com> wrote:


  No it cannot. It uses the CSM (Connectorized Module without sync). You will 
have to swap it out with the GPS module to do any kind of sync. 



  Thanks,

  Sriram



  From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Gino Villarini via Af
  Sent: Monday, November 24, 2014 7:37 AM
  To: <af@afmug.com>
  Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ePMP Force



  Can the force 110 receive sync via the Ethernet port?

  Gino A. Villarini 

  @gvillarini






  On Nov 24, 2014, at 9:23 AM, Sakid Ahmed via Af <af@afmug.com> wrote:

    Some clarification on this topic – 



    Only the GPS Sync Connectorized unit can do any type of Sync. Via onboard 
GPS and the external puck (for added gain) or via CMM on the Ethernet side. 

    The CSM (Connectorized Module without sync) CANNOT be used as a sync device 
whatsoever.



    As for the Force PTP, yes, it does use the GPS unit but sync is disabled in 
the Force PTP configuration.



    Hope this helps.



    Sakid



    p.s. There is a topic around mixing CMM3/CMM4s/onboard as a GPS source 
across a tower. This is covered in the document 

    ePMP Configuration in a Frequency Reuse Deployment



    Found at 

    https://support.cambiumnetworks.com/files/epmp/



    From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Tyson Burris @ Internet 
Comm. Inc via Af
    Sent: Saturday, November 22, 2014 5:44 PM
    To: af@afmug.com
    Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ePMP Force



    Yes in training it was confirmed that the ePmP can get power and sync 
through CMM 3&4 but the 3 may be tricky to workaround. 



    Also you can gps time your PTP link but it wasn't recommend.  You should 
use the Mac level for your ptp 

    Sent from my iPhone


    On Nov 22, 2014, at 5:32 PM, Paul McCall via Af <af@afmug.com> wrote:

      Jeff,



      It looks like you are saying that the connectorized radios withouth sync 
CAN indeed get sync from external source, CMM3, CMM4, sync injector.



      I wasn’t aware that was the case



      From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Jeff Broadwick - 
Lists via Af
      Sent: Saturday, November 22, 2014 12:36 PM
      To: af@afmug.com
      Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ePMP Force



      The 110 PTP unit has sync on board...disabled...expect that's to keep us 
from buying that unit and swapping the radios for a connectorized unit without 
sync.  :-)



      I expect that, like the connectorized radio without sync, that you can 
take sync from a different source, like a CMM4.




      Jeff Broadwick

      ConVergence Technologies, Inc.

      312-205-2519 Office

      574-220-7826 Cell

      jbroadw...@converge-tech.com


      On Nov 22, 2014, at 12:31 PM, Paul McCall via Af <af@afmug.com> wrote:

        For Cambium.... we have a very remote tower that feeds several other 
towers.  Everything is OSPF but logically...

        Tower R (the main remote tower - a 190 ft. Rohn 25G with several 
anti-twist devices) is "fed" by...
           Tower A - 26 miles away - UBNT 3.65ghz Rocket M5 AND a Mikrotik 
RB912 5 Ghz
               This commercial tower (Tower A) has over 300Mbit of usable 
bandwidth and feeds about 75 to 85 Mbit to Tower A
           Tower B - 9 miles away - UBNT 5ghz Rocket M5
               This tower (Tower B) is a 90 ft. Rohn 25G        

        Tower R then feeds...
           Tower C - 12 miles away - Mikrotik RB912 - 5 GHz - 50 Mbit of usable 
bandwidth.  (Rohn 25G 120 ft.)
           Tower D - 15 miles away - Mikrotik RB912 - 5 GHz - 40 Mbit of usable 
bandwidth.  (Rohn 25G 120 ft.)
           Tower E - 17 miles away - Mikrotik RB912 - 5 GHz - 40 Mbit of usable 
bandwidth.  (Rohn 25G 120 ft.)
           Tower F - 14 miles away - Mikrotik RB912 - 5 GHz - 40 Mbit of usable 
bandwidth.  (Rohn 25G 120 ft.)

        To get all this to work without Sync was quite a frequency juggling 
act.  There are other towers in the area and towers C, D, E, F connect (chain) 
to each other on the "back side" and we use a couple 3.65Ghz UBNT radios on the 
backside links.

        The challenge...

        First of all, I need more BW to each tower, but mostly Tower C.  And, I 
need better consistency... at times the links do not perform as I expect and 
then I get customer complaints etc. I hate that.  

        So, what would be the best solution that Cambium can recommend other 
than a ton of licensed links?  Obviously, the gear I am using now is 
inexpensive.

        The PTP110 solution ... 2ms unsynced....    can it sync, now or 
tomorrow?   Latency with sync?

        Paul


        -----Original Message-----
        From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Matt via Af
        Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2014 11:47 AM
        To: af@afmug.com
        Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ePMP Force






        Hi,



          Please allow me to clarify.



          The Force 110 uses the Connectorized UnSync'd unit with the two 
10/100 FE ports.



          The Force 110 PTP uses the Connectorized GPS Sync'd unit with the 

          single GigE port that supports 802.3af PoE in addition to proprietary 
PoE. GPS capabilities will be disabled (but the radio can still use the on 
board GPS chip to track satellites and provide coordinates).



          The 2ms latency is achieved purely through software changes in 
Release 2.4 and will apply to both products.


        Reading this spec sheet.

        
http://www.cambiumnetworks.com/files/PRODUCTS/ePMP/FORCE/Force%20110%20PTP_Oct2014.pdf






            LATENCY (nominal, one way) < 2 ms (PTP Mode), 6 ms (Flexible Frame 

              Mode) , 17 ms (GPS Sync Mode)

Reply via email to