I know that reduced sync latency was on the menu. What Q should we expect that in?
----- Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "John Butler via Af" <af@afmug.com> To: af@afmug.com Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2014 9:24:38 PM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ePMP Force 2 ms is without sync From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Mike Hammett via Af Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2014 8:12 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ePMP Force The 2 ms is with or without sync on 2.4? ----- Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "Sriram Chaturvedi via Af" < af@afmug.com > To: "Mathew Howard via Af" < af@afmug.com > Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2014 8:03:13 PM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ePMP Force Hi, Please allow me to clarify. The Force 110 uses the Connectorized UnSync'd unit with the two 10/100 FE ports. The Force 110 PTP uses the Connectorized GPS Sync'd unit with the single GigE port that supports 802.3af PoE in addition to proprietary PoE. GPS capabilities will be disabled (but the radio can still use the on board GPS chip to track satellites and provide coordinates). The 2ms latency is achieved purely through software changes in Release 2.4 and will apply to both products. There's more being discussed in this thread: http://community.cambiumnetworks.com/t5/ePMP-1000/ePmP-Force-110/m-p/35810#U35810 ePmP; Force 110 - Cambium Networks Community I'm looking at the specs for the Force 110 and I see it says the radio can achieve 150 Mbs of real data throughput. Then I see the ethernet connect... Read more... Thanks, Sriram From: Af < af-boun...@afmug.com > on behalf of Mathew Howard via Af < af@afmug.com > Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2014 7:29 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ePMP Force Isn't the 2ms without sync? From: Af [af-boun...@afmug.com] on behalf of Josh Luthman via Af [af@afmug.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2014 7:04 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ePMP Force 2ms check again http://www.cambiumnetworks.com/spec-sheets/epmp_force110_ptp_specs/epmp_force110_ptp_specs-2 Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Nov 19, 2014 7:59 PM, "Matt via Af" < af@afmug.com > wrote: > The ptp, yes. Oops, I forgot to include ePMP PTP Force 110 in my question. Anyone got there hands on them yet? Spec sheet says 17ms latency with GPS enabled in PTP. Was really hoping for less then that. >> > Exactly, the force110 based PTP does not include GPS sync >> > >> >> The Force 110 PTP PDF spec sheet states GPS sync. >> >> > >> > The same as any another SM? It's just a connectorized radio with 25db >> > dish. >> > >> >> >> Anyone got there hands on an ePMP Force yet? Curious on actual >> >> latency and throughput with GPS enabled.
