Just reset it, I don't think anyone knows theirs.
Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 5:18 PM, Chuck McCown via Af <af@afmug.com> wrote: > If I remembered my password. > > *From:* Josh Luthman via Af <af@afmug.com> > *Sent:* Monday, December 08, 2014 3:14 PM > *To:* af@afmug.com > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Animal Farm List weirdness/requests > > In regards to 1 go here and disable sending yourself your own messages > > > http://afmug.com/mailman/options/af > > > > Josh Luthman > Office: 937-552-2340 > Direct: 937-552-2343 > 1100 Wayne St > Suite 1337 > Troy, OH 45373 > > On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 5:13 PM, Mike Hammett via Af <af@afmug.com> wrote: > >> I haven't noticed #1. >> >> PDMNet was going to fix #2 back in September, but things came up. >> >> >> >> ----- >> Mike Hammett >> Intelligent Computing Solutions >> http://www.ics-il.com >> >> ------------------------------ >> *From: *"Sean Heskett via Af" <af@afmug.com> >> *To: *af@afmug.com >> *Sent: *Monday, December 8, 2014 4:12:18 PM >> *Subject: *[AFMUG] Animal Farm List weirdness/requests >> >> >> Hello, >> >> Whomever is now the list manager I have two requests (gripes) >> >> 1. for some reason when i send a message it shows up in the conversation >> thread twice (i'm using Gmail) I'm not sure if everyone else sees it twice >> or just me. i only get one message from other users (which is the expected >> behavior). >> >> 2. It only shows the name of the person who sent the message and strips >> out their email. Is there any way we can add this back in. It's really >> frustrating when a cambium or UBNT employee will post a reply and i don't >> immediately recognize that this is a response from the manufacturer. even >> if it stripped the email but put back in "user at domain dot com" instead >> of "u...@domain.com" if the reason from it's removal was to prevent spam >> etc. >> >> 2a. For the manufacturers, would y'all mind adding a signature file until >> this is fixed so we know it's an "official" response??? >> >> thanks for listening, >> >> Sean >> >> >> > >