youre the man on that #1 thing, its been driving me batty

On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 4:26 PM, Josh Luthman via Af <af@afmug.com> wrote:

> Yessss!!!!!!!!!
>
>
> Josh Luthman
> Office: 937-552-2340
> Direct: 937-552-2343
> 1100 Wayne St
> Suite 1337
> Troy, OH 45373
>
> On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 5:22 PM, Sean Heskett via Af <af@afmug.com> wrote:
>
>> aaahhhhh THANK YOU JOSH!!!!!  i owe you a beer at AF ;-)
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 3:14 PM, Josh Luthman via Af <af@afmug.com> wrote:
>>
>>> In regards to 1 go here and disable sending yourself your own messages
>>>
>>> http://afmug.com/mailman/options/af
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Josh Luthman
>>> Office: 937-552-2340
>>> Direct: 937-552-2343
>>> 1100 Wayne St
>>> Suite 1337
>>> Troy, OH 45373
>>>
>>> On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 5:13 PM, Mike Hammett via Af <af@afmug.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I haven't noticed #1.
>>>>
>>>> PDMNet was going to fix #2 back in September, but things came up.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> -----
>>>> Mike Hammett
>>>> Intelligent Computing Solutions
>>>> http://www.ics-il.com
>>>>
>>>> ------------------------------
>>>> *From: *"Sean Heskett via Af" <af@afmug.com>
>>>> *To: *af@afmug.com
>>>> *Sent: *Monday, December 8, 2014 4:12:18 PM
>>>> *Subject: *[AFMUG] Animal Farm List weirdness/requests
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Hello,
>>>>
>>>> Whomever is now the list manager I have two requests (gripes)
>>>>
>>>> 1.  for some reason when i send a message it shows up in the
>>>> conversation thread twice (i'm using Gmail) I'm not sure if everyone else
>>>> sees it twice or just me.  i only get one message from other users (which
>>>> is the expected behavior).
>>>>
>>>> 2.  It only shows the name of the person who sent the message and
>>>> strips out their email.  Is there any way we can add this back in.  It's
>>>> really frustrating when a cambium or UBNT employee will post a reply and i
>>>> don't immediately recognize that this is a response from the manufacturer.
>>>>  even if it stripped the email but put back in "user at domain dot com"
>>>> instead of "u...@domain.com" if the reason from it's removal was to
>>>> prevent spam etc.
>>>>
>>>> 2a. For the manufacturers, would y'all mind adding a signature file
>>>> until this is fixed so we know it's an "official" response???
>>>>
>>>> thanks for listening,
>>>>
>>>> Sean
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>


-- 
All parts should go together without forcing. You must remember that the
parts you are reassembling were disassembled by you. Therefore, if you
can't get them together again, there must be a reason. By all means, do not
use a hammer. -- IBM maintenance manual, 1925

Reply via email to