I see you post the links, but I'll let physics tell me what a good link is. ;-)
Full modulation or bust! ----- Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "Ben Moore via Af" <af@afmug.com> To: af@afmug.com Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2014 11:02:50 AM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] RM5AC-PMP Embargo lifted.. We have looked at this, but alignment would be a real issue (and ensuring proper separation, etc...)...We are still kicking around some different options. Though we are getting a lot of good feedback already on long links with AF5. On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 9:56 AM, Eric Kuhnke via Af < af@afmug.com > wrote: I would like a pro grade AF5 connectorized, for use with a pair of the 3' Jirous high performance antennas. Each link would need 4 dishes but you'd be able to go a lot further than the current af5 antenna size. On Dec 10, 2014 10:05 PM, "Mathew Howard via Af" < af@afmug.com > wrote: <blockquote> PtMP based on the airfiber in 3.65ghz would seem like a good fit, with the new rules that are (hopefully) coming... licensed also seems like an obvious place to go with airfiber. From: Af [ af-boun...@afmug.com ] on behalf of Josh Reynolds via Af [ af@afmug.com ] Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2014 11:42 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] RM5AC-PMP Embargo lifted.. I'd be incredibl y surprised if they didn't do a ptmp. Not sure a revamped 24GHz is in consider ation whe n there's so many other bands they could release equipment for. Maybe licensed? Hrmmmm... One can hope, right? josh reynolds :: chief information officer spitwspots :: www.spitwspots.com On 12/10/2014 08:19 PM, Colin Stanners via Af wrote: <blockquote> I'm sure they'll do a 24ghz AF 2/Duo/Super/Ultra with 1024QAM. In the 100mhz channels both ways that'll allow around 1280mbit FD - so a 2.5gbit backhaul... I'm assuming 3.65 will come as well. On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 11:10 PM, Josh Reynolds via Af < af@afmug.com > wrote: <blockquote> I'd guess there's going to be... a least 3 AirFiber products released in the next 12-18 months. If not sooner. Now... what would those be? Hrmmmmmmmmm..... josh reynolds :: chief information officer spitwspots :: www.spitwspots.com On 12/10/2014 08:07 PM, Rory Conaway via Af wrote: <blockquote> I don’t know what you are talking about. Rory From: Af [ mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com ] On Behalf Of Josh Reynolds via Af Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2014 10:05 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] RM5AC-PMP Embargo lifted.. I'm sure that AirFiber team (which they seem to keep expanding) is silently sitting in their own little corner in Chicago doing nothing. :P josh reynolds :: chief information officer spitwspots :: www.spitwspots.com On 12/10/2014 07:48 PM, Rory Conaway via Af wrote: <blockquote> I think the ePMP is going to run into the same problem all the 802.11ac vendors are seeing with the new OOBE rules. The 450 is able to provide a better performance within the new environment so there will still be a differentiator. The only question if it’s worth the difference. Rory From: Af [ mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com ] On Behalf Of Stefan Englhardt via Af Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2014 9:45 PM To: Josh Luthman via Af Subject: Re: [AFMUG] RM5AC-PMP Embargo lifted.. .AC is an upgrade to .N. Cambium has the choice to use it or not. Others do. epmp competes with 450 right now but helps to keep customers and applications where 450 does not meet the price point. Von: Josh Luthman via Af Gesendet: Donnerstag, 11. Dezember 2014 04:00 An: Josh Luthman via Af An .AC ePMP would be incredible - but the issue is whether Cambium would be fearful of it competing too much with the 450. What does a company do when it has 2 products that are too good, and the cheaper one starts to outshine the more expensive one in the most often used benchmark? (mbps - even .AC ePMP is unlikely to beat 450 in scalability / latency / etc). On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 8:46 PM, Stefan Englhardt via Af < af@afmug.com > wrote: > The answer is to release an epmp1000-ac. > > > *Von:* Josh Luthman via Af < af@afmug.com > > *Gesendet:* Donnerstag, 11. Dezember 2014 01:39 > *An:* Josh Luthman via Af < af@afmug.com > > > I hope Cambium is listing on this point. > > Get rid of speed license and make it as unlimited radios at 10 meg price > point. > > They are about to have more competition from lot of other vendors too. > > Tushar > > -----Original Message----- > From: Af [ mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com ] On Behalf Of Peter Kranz via Af > Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2014 3:10 PM > To: af@afmug.com > Subject: Re: [AFMUG] RM5AC-PMP Embargo lifted.. > > > Yes no maybe. > > I think this is good news actually, as it is sure to light the competitive > fire under Cambium to get to feature parity and get rid of speed licenses. > > </blockquote> </blockquote> </blockquote> </blockquote> </blockquote>
