Hey beehive chuck, What about a stinger for the connectorized 3.65 SM similar to the 900mhz stingers???
It'd be nice to have a slip-on solution that has a gain between a bare SM and a dish. -sean On Wednesday, December 24, 2014, Chuck McCown via Af <af@afmug.com> wrote: > I tried. The internal antenna coupled with the larger wavelength made > everything I tried impractical. I got 4-5 dB at most. Not worth building > the tooling. > > -----Original Message----- From: Ken Hohhof via Af > Sent: Tuesday, December 23, 2014 9:36 PM > To: af@afmug.com > Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 450 3.65 SM Antenna > > I'm trying to find the response from somebody at Cambium when I asked about > the feasibility of a CLIP for 3.65 GHz. I think it was something about too > big and not enough gain. Obviously with the new case design you couldn't > just slip a 5 GHz Stinger or CLIP on a 3.65 GHz SM to see what happens. > But > I suspect something 50% bigger than the existing CLIP and with 6 dB gain > over a bare SM might make some people happy. Certainly it would be cheaper > than an SMC plus a panel, and smaller than a reflector dish. > > Here's a scary thought, remember the LENS that weighed a ton? Make that > 50% > bigger and put it on the 3.65 SM which also weighs a ton, now you have 2 > tons. > > > -----Original Message----- From: Jon Langeler via Af > Sent: Tuesday, December 23, 2014 10:19 PM > To: af@afmug.com > Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 450 3.65 SM Antenna > > ITElite > > > Sent from my iPhone > > On Dec 23, 2014, at 7:17 PM, Matt via Af <af@afmug.com> wrote: >> >> I have a few places I need more gain then a bare 450 3.65 SM but >> cannot fit a reflector. Is there a small panel antenna that works >> with the 450 3.65 SM? >> > > >
