Not even in the works. 2.4 is supposed to release q1 2015. The 5 GHz force110 just came out.
Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Wed, Dec 24, 2014 at 2:13 PM, chuck--- via Af <af@afmug.com> wrote: > > Could be done but don’t they have a force 110 type of product for that? > > *From:* Sean Heskett via Af <af@afmug.com> > *Sent:* Wednesday, December 24, 2014 10:13 AM > *To:* af@afmug.com > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] 450 3.65 SM Antenna > > Hey beehive chuck, > > What about a stinger for the connectorized 3.65 SM similar to the 900mhz > stingers??? > > It'd be nice to have a slip-on solution that has a gain between a bare SM > and a dish. > > -sean > > On Wednesday, December 24, 2014, Chuck McCown via Af <af@afmug.com> wrote: > >> I tried. The internal antenna coupled with the larger wavelength made >> everything I tried impractical. I got 4-5 dB at most. Not worth building >> the tooling. >> >> -----Original Message----- From: Ken Hohhof via Af >> Sent: Tuesday, December 23, 2014 9:36 PM >> To: af@afmug.com >> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 450 3.65 SM Antenna >> >> I'm trying to find the response from somebody at Cambium when I asked >> about >> the feasibility of a CLIP for 3.65 GHz. I think it was something about >> too >> big and not enough gain. Obviously with the new case design you couldn't >> just slip a 5 GHz Stinger or CLIP on a 3.65 GHz SM to see what happens. >> But >> I suspect something 50% bigger than the existing CLIP and with 6 dB gain >> over a bare SM might make some people happy. Certainly it would be >> cheaper >> than an SMC plus a panel, and smaller than a reflector dish. >> >> Here's a scary thought, remember the LENS that weighed a ton? Make that >> 50% >> bigger and put it on the 3.65 SM which also weighs a ton, now you have 2 >> tons. >> >> >> -----Original Message----- From: Jon Langeler via Af >> Sent: Tuesday, December 23, 2014 10:19 PM >> To: af@afmug.com >> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 450 3.65 SM Antenna >> >> ITElite >> >> >> Sent from my iPhone >> >> On Dec 23, 2014, at 7:17 PM, Matt via Af <af@afmug.com> wrote: >>> >>> I have a few places I need more gain then a bare 450 3.65 SM but >>> cannot fit a reflector. Is there a small panel antenna that works >>> with the 450 3.65 SM? >>> >> >> >>
