OK, was thinking ePMP for some reason... Forgot about the FSK style case on
the 3.65.
Perhaps something could be made for 3.65 but it is dual slant, right? So if I
embedded a patch array in a stinger case it will be expensive due to being dual
pol. I tried a simple reflector/subreflector stinger approach and didn’t get
anything worth having.
From: Sean Heskett via Af
Sent: Wednesday, December 24, 2014 1:03 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 450 3.65 SM Antenna
plus force 110 is for epmp (as far as I'm aware)
On Wed, Dec 24, 2014 at 12:16 PM, Josh Luthman via Af <af@afmug.com> wrote:
Not even in the works. 2.4 is supposed to release q1 2015. The 5 GHz
force110 just came out.
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Wed, Dec 24, 2014 at 2:13 PM, chuck--- via Af <af@afmug.com> wrote:
Could be done but don’t they have a force 110 type of product for that?
From: Sean Heskett via Af
Sent: Wednesday, December 24, 2014 10:13 AM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 450 3.65 SM Antenna
Hey beehive chuck,
What about a stinger for the connectorized 3.65 SM similar to the 900mhz
stingers???
It'd be nice to have a slip-on solution that has a gain between a bare SM
and a dish.
-sean
On Wednesday, December 24, 2014, Chuck McCown via Af <af@afmug.com> wrote:
I tried. The internal antenna coupled with the larger wavelength made
everything I tried impractical. I got 4-5 dB at most. Not worth building the
tooling.
-----Original Message----- From: Ken Hohhof via Af
Sent: Tuesday, December 23, 2014 9:36 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 450 3.65 SM Antenna
I'm trying to find the response from somebody at Cambium when I asked
about
the feasibility of a CLIP for 3.65 GHz. I think it was something about
too
big and not enough gain. Obviously with the new case design you couldn't
just slip a 5 GHz Stinger or CLIP on a 3.65 GHz SM to see what happens.
But
I suspect something 50% bigger than the existing CLIP and with 6 dB gain
over a bare SM might make some people happy. Certainly it would be
cheaper
than an SMC plus a panel, and smaller than a reflector dish.
Here's a scary thought, remember the LENS that weighed a ton? Make that
50%
bigger and put it on the 3.65 SM which also weighs a ton, now you have 2
tons.
-----Original Message----- From: Jon Langeler via Af
Sent: Tuesday, December 23, 2014 10:19 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 450 3.65 SM Antenna
ITElite
Sent from my iPhone
On Dec 23, 2014, at 7:17 PM, Matt via Af <af@afmug.com> wrote:
I have a few places I need more gain then a bare 450 3.65 SM but
cannot fit a reflector. Is there a small panel antenna that works
with the 450 3.65 SM?
