Could be done but don’t they have a force 110 type of product for that?
From: Sean Heskett via Af
Sent: Wednesday, December 24, 2014 10:13 AM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 450 3.65 SM Antenna
Hey beehive chuck,
What about a stinger for the connectorized 3.65 SM similar to the 900mhz
stingers???
It'd be nice to have a slip-on solution that has a gain between a bare SM and a
dish.
-sean
On Wednesday, December 24, 2014, Chuck McCown via Af <af@afmug.com> wrote:
I tried. The internal antenna coupled with the larger wavelength made
everything I tried impractical. I got 4-5 dB at most. Not worth building the
tooling.
-----Original Message----- From: Ken Hohhof via Af
Sent: Tuesday, December 23, 2014 9:36 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 450 3.65 SM Antenna
I'm trying to find the response from somebody at Cambium when I asked about
the feasibility of a CLIP for 3.65 GHz. I think it was something about too
big and not enough gain. Obviously with the new case design you couldn't
just slip a 5 GHz Stinger or CLIP on a 3.65 GHz SM to see what happens. But
I suspect something 50% bigger than the existing CLIP and with 6 dB gain
over a bare SM might make some people happy. Certainly it would be cheaper
than an SMC plus a panel, and smaller than a reflector dish.
Here's a scary thought, remember the LENS that weighed a ton? Make that 50%
bigger and put it on the 3.65 SM which also weighs a ton, now you have 2
tons.
-----Original Message----- From: Jon Langeler via Af
Sent: Tuesday, December 23, 2014 10:19 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 450 3.65 SM Antenna
ITElite
Sent from my iPhone
On Dec 23, 2014, at 7:17 PM, Matt via Af <af@afmug.com> wrote:
I have a few places I need more gain then a bare 450 3.65 SM but
cannot fit a reflector. Is there a small panel antenna that works
with the 450 3.65 SM?
