I refer you to my post earlier this afternoon. 



----- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 
http://www.ics-il.com 

----- Original Message -----

From: "TJ Trout" <t...@voltbb.com> 
To: af@afmug.com 
Sent: Friday, January 16, 2015 3:48:18 PM 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 6 or 11ghz best option for higher capacity ? 


What is my least expensive option for getting more bandwidth in 6ghz or 11ghz ? 
Right now I have 366mbps (56mhz 256qam) would like double or better? 


On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 1:03 PM, Jon Langeler < jon-ispli...@michwave.net > 
wrote: 






compression yields a lot at 64byte packet, but yields much less at 256byte and 
larger...it's a curve. 


Also if your upgrading a long 5GHz link with 6Ghz, you'll probably be slightly 
better off even if the calcs say 'low uptime'. 11GHz will 'swing' during rains 
more than 6GHz obviously so the higher gain from the same size dishes helps 
there. Licensing a wide single polarity is always cheapest... 


-Jon 


Sent from my iPhone 

On Jan 16, 2015, at 3:13 PM, Josh Luthman < j...@imaginenetworksllc.com > 
wrote: 


<blockquote>




That sounds backwards. Why would smaller packets net you greater throughput? 








Josh Luthman 
Office: 937-552-2340 
Direct: 937-552-2343 
1100 Wayne St 
Suite 1337 
Troy, OH 45373 



On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 3:10 PM, Jeremy < jeremysmi...@gmail.com > wrote: 

<blockquote>



It's really 60. Ours does 1.4Gbps, 700Mbps full duplex (if every packet was a 
VoIP packet)...500Mbps FDX is a more realistic real-world TCP throughput that 
you can expect. 






On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 1:07 PM, Hardy, Tim < tha...@comsearch.com > wrote: 

<blockquote>





It’s really 60! 

        
60 MHz 
        
CH      
N(      
G( 
        
1       
5960.0250       
6212.0650 
        
2       
6019.3250       
6271.3650 
        
3       
6078.6250       
6330.6650 
        
4       
6137.9250       
6389.9650 

As far as XPIC on 30 MHz vs. 60 MHz it all depends on the environment. If x-pol 
is needed to clear a channel, it isn’t going to be available on the orthogonal 
polarization. 



From: Af [mailto: af-boun...@afmug.com ] On Behalf Of Ken Hohhof 
Sent: Friday, January 16, 2015 2:59 PM 




To: af@afmug.com 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 6 or 11ghz best option for higher capacity ? 









In 6 GHz, is 60 really 60, or is it 30+30 contiguous? 



I’m thinking it might be easier to do XPIC on the same 30 MHz channel than to 
find 60 MHz of available spectrum, but I haven’t done anything in 6 GHz, mainly 
because of antenna size. Yes the FCC did relax the antenna rules to allow down 
to a 3 ft dish, but realistically that won’t give you enough gain unless it’s a 
short link, especially given that 6 GHz is subject to multipath fades. So 
bottom line I haven’t kept up with what you can do in 6 GHz, so I could easily 
be wrong or behind the times. 






From: Mike Hammett 

Sent: Friday, January 16, 2015 1:24 PM 

To: af@afmug.com 

Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 6 or 11ghz best option for higher capacity ? 




30 MHz in the 7 GHz band, 30 MHz in some 6 GHz, 60 MHz in the rest of 6 GHz... 
IIRC. 



----- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 
http://www.ics-il.com 




From: "Ken Hohhof" < af...@kwisp.com > 
To: af@afmug.com 
Sent: Friday, January 16, 2015 1:18:19 PM 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 6 or 11ghz best option for higher capacity ? 



I would first talk to your frequency coordinator about what FCC channel widths 
can be licensed in what bands. I’m not sure 40 MHz channels exist in 6 GHz, and 
I believe you’ll find an 80 MHz channel width means you need to license 2 
adjacent channels. There is no benefit to having a radio that does 80 MHz 
channels if that’s not what you license, other than maybe having consistent 
equipment across your network to simplify sparing. 








From: TJ Trout 

Sent: Friday, January 16, 2015 1:05 PM 

To: af@afmug.com 

Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 6 or 11ghz best option for higher capacity ? 




11ghz integra doesn't exist, and when it does in april it's just 60mhz! Should 
I even be considering a 60mhz radio? Seems like 80 is the way to go? 




On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 11:02 AM, Gino Villarini < g...@aeronetpr.com > wrote: 




11 ghz integra 








Gino A. Villarini 

President 

Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp. 

www.aeronetpr.com 

@aeronetpr 







From: TJ Trout < t...@voltbb.com > 
Reply-To: " af@afmug.com " < af@afmug.com > 
Date: Friday, January 16, 2015 at 2:57 PM 
To: " af@afmug.com " < af@afmug.com > 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 6 or 11ghz best option for higher capacity ? 




I guess what I'm interested in is what is the cheapest 6 or 11ghz 80mhz radio 
in terms of bits/hz or should I just use the lumina in 2+0? 

On Jan 16, 2015 10:54 AM, "TJ Trout" < t...@voltbb.com > wrote: 
So I have a lumina on 11ghz 56mhz that I need to upgrade, what is the most 
economical option for more capacity ? Saf doesn't really have much besides 2+0 
right now (maybe that's my best option?) So I was thinking about trying another 
brand something with maybe 80mhz channels ? What are my options that won't cost 
an arm and a leg ? 







</blockquote>


</blockquote>

</blockquote>


Reply via email to