Example:  Powercode mostly loads and then seems to hang for quite awhile on
Firefox, but loads fast on Chrome.

On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 12:04 PM, Jeremy <jeremysmi...@gmail.com> wrote:

> I've never used EPMP but I have noticed some interfaces lag on one browser
> and not on another.  What browser is everyone using when they see lag?
> What browser are those of you who aren't seeing lag using?
>
> On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 11:59 AM, Ken Hohhof <af...@kwisp.com> wrote:
>
>>   Good job of merging 2 threads!  You win one free Internet!
>>
>>  *From:* Chuck McCown <ch...@wbmfg.com>
>> *Sent:* Tuesday, January 20, 2015 12:48 PM
>> *To:* af@afmug.com
>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] EPMP Minimum System Specs <rant>
>>
>>   Yeah but you bought the advantage GUI license, right?
>>
>>  *From:* Sean Heskett <af...@zirkel.us>
>> *Sent:* Tuesday, January 20, 2015 11:45 AM
>> *To:* af@afmug.com
>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] EPMP Minimum System Specs <rant>
>>
>>  less than 5 seconds on my iPhone as well.
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 11:43 AM, Josh Luthman <
>> j...@imaginenetworksllc.com> wrote:
>>
>>> I doubt that 4 of my high end machines all have the same problem.  The
>>> interface takes too long when it first shows up.  Maybe it's because it
>>> gets all the information at once, maybe not.  Don't care.  I want it to be
>>> more smooth and faster.
>>>
>>> My phone (Droid Maxx) is one of the most recent models for Android.  The
>>> interface is terribly slow and clumsy on that.
>>>
>>> Well if you feel a poor technology choice was the cause, that's fine,
>>> but it's just flat out wrong.  I don't want to carry a big fat i7 laptop up
>>> the tower when I could just simply use my phone.  It works with Ubiquiti,
>>> FSK Cambium, Tranzeo, Trango, Mikrotik, etc it should only make sense the
>>> one product with a clumsy interface needs fixed instead of changing my
>>> devices that work with the competitors products (as well as different
>>> products under their portfolio).
>>>
>>>
>>> Josh Luthman
>>> Office: 937-552-2340
>>> Direct: 937-552-2343
>>> 1100 Wayne St
>>> Suite 1337
>>> Troy, OH 45373
>>>
>>> On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 1:36 PM, Sean Heskett <af...@zirkel.us> wrote:
>>>
>>>> i'm just stating that on all of our computers i've never seen the ePMP
>>>> page load slowly.
>>>>
>>>> maybe it's a computer problem and not a device problem, just trying to
>>>> bring valid input to the discussion.
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 11:34 AM, Josh Luthman <
>>>> j...@imaginenetworksllc.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Why are you/others arguing that the speed is just fine?  This doesn't
>>>>> even make sense.  There are people with slower laptops that work with 
>>>>> other
>>>>> modern devices and epmp is the only interface that loads slow.  There's no
>>>>> point in arguing peoples valid complaints.  Are you trying to direct the
>>>>> engineers attention to something else?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Josh Luthman
>>>>> Office: 937-552-2340
>>>>> Direct: 937-552-2343
>>>>> 1100 Wayne St
>>>>> Suite 1337
>>>>> Troy, OH 45373
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 1:30 PM, Mike Hammett <af...@ics-il.net>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>  Three, maybe four seconds to load the initial screen and then two
>>>>>> maybe three seconds to login. As I doubt a screen capture will work when
>>>>>> I'm RDPed in, I'll record the entire login process when I get home and 
>>>>>> post
>>>>>> it up on YouTube.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -----
>>>>>> Mike Hammett
>>>>>> Intelligent Computing Solutions
>>>>>> http://www.ics-il.com
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ------------------------------
>>>>>>  *From: *"Josh Luthman" <j...@imaginenetworksllc.com>
>>>>>> *To: *af@afmug.com
>>>>>> *Sent: *Tuesday, January 20, 2015 12:26:09 PM
>>>>>> *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] EPMP Minimum System Specs <rant>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>   Login takes forever.  The first like 10-15 seconds just load and
>>>>>> load and load.  Once you're in, it's acceptable in terms of page 
>>>>>> rendering.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Josh Luthman
>>>>>> Office: 937-552-2340
>>>>>> Direct: 937-552-2343
>>>>>> 1100 Wayne St
>>>>>> Suite 1337
>>>>>> Troy, OH 45373
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 1:22 PM, Sean Heskett <af...@zirkel.us>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> we use macbook pro's and the ePMP GUI has never been slow for us.
>>>>>>> It was UGLY, but they fixed that with version 2.0 haha.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> not sure why everyone says it's slow tho because we've never seen it.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 2 cents
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> -sean
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 9:57 AM, Nate Burke <n...@blastcomm.com>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Ok, Cambium, this is a little sad.  My Field Laptop, a Lenovo
>>>>>>>> S10-3t, Atom Processor with Windows 8.1 cannot load the EPMP WEB Pages 
>>>>>>>> in a
>>>>>>>> timely manner.  We're talking 40-60 seconds for initial load, and 20-30
>>>>>>>> seconds per screen refresh/menu change.  Since I'm going to have to go 
>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>> the boss, and tell him that I need a new laptop to do any field
>>>>>>>> troubleshooting for these new radios, what are the minimum system 
>>>>>>>> specs for
>>>>>>>> a machine to view the EPMP Screens?  Unless Cambium is going to get 
>>>>>>>> their
>>>>>>>> Web interface under control as of Yesterday.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> They still swear that the GUI was all developed in house and not
>>>>>>>> purchased (something I still can't believe).  I'd like to know who the
>>>>>>>> engineers/managers are who signed off on that design.  I can only 
>>>>>>>> imaging
>>>>>>>> that there was a group of guys sitting around the conference table,
>>>>>>>> watching the presentation on the GUI on the projector up front, all 
>>>>>>>> nodding
>>>>>>>> their heads in agreement, "I think this is a wonderful layout, the 
>>>>>>>> field
>>>>>>>> tech's won't mind waiting a couple extra minutes for the pages to load 
>>>>>>>> so
>>>>>>>> they can look this pretty!!"
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I think that Cambium should step up and get engineers from ALL
>>>>>>>> aspects of product development out into the field.  40 seconds waiting 
>>>>>>>> for
>>>>>>>> the page to load is fine when you're sitting in the office, but not 
>>>>>>>> when
>>>>>>>> you have the laptop balanced on a stack of firewood in the freezing 
>>>>>>>> rain
>>>>>>>> trying to get to the monitoring page to see why a radio isn't linking 
>>>>>>>> up.
>>>>>>>> I think that every WISP on this list would be more than happy to host 
>>>>>>>> an
>>>>>>>> engineer for a day. Heck, even if they go into the parking lot and 
>>>>>>>> assemble
>>>>>>>> it on the tailgate of someone's Pickup, they'll get some idea of what 
>>>>>>>> we
>>>>>>>> experience.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I have a feeling that if all steps of the Dev process took a week
>>>>>>>> in the field, We'd have a radio that had a GUI that responded 
>>>>>>>> instantly on
>>>>>>>> any device, and radios that assembled and mounted (and unmounted) with 
>>>>>>>> 1
>>>>>>>> gloved hand.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> </rant>
>>>>>>>> Nate
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>

Reply via email to