GoDaddy On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 2:51 PM, Josh Luthman <j...@imaginenetworksllc.com> wrote:
> What's your Powercode address? Who does your SSL cert? > > Josh Luthman > Office: 937-552-2340 > Direct: 937-552-2343 > 1100 Wayne St > Suite 1337 > Troy, OH 45373 > On Jan 20, 2015 4:45 PM, "Jeremy" <jeremysmi...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> I used to use Chrome. A few versions back they made it so that you >> cannot save passwords for SSL exceptions, and cannot add permanent >> exceptions. We use SSL on all of our APs, and according to chrome our >> Billing server cert is incorrect, even though we have triple checked the >> install and no other browsers flag it as insecure. This leaves us tapping >> away super long and complicated passwords (what else would we use??) out in >> the field in Chrome, or we use Firefox and deal with a bit of lag in >> Powercode. I find that the small amount of lag is far better than >> constantly trying to tap out passwords on a tablet. Ok, not trying to >> derail this too far OT. Have those of you who are experiencing the lag >> with EPMP tried another browser? >> >> On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 12:41 PM, Josh Luthman < >> j...@imaginenetworksllc.com> wrote: >> >>> User base is CLEARLY an important key!!! >>> >>> collected from W3Schools' log-files since 2002 >>> >>> >>> Josh Luthman >>> Office: 937-552-2340 >>> Direct: 937-552-2343 >>> 1100 Wayne St >>> Suite 1337 >>> Troy, OH 45373 >>> >>> On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 2:37 PM, Josh Reynolds <j...@spitwspots.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> http://www.w3schools.com/browsers/browsers_stats.asp >>>> >>>> Chrome (no version attached) has 61% market share >>>> >>>> On January 20, 2015 10:31:25 AM AKST, Ken Hohhof <af...@kwisp.com> >>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> But wait until Windows 10 comes out with the Spartan browser. >>>>> >>>>> *From:* Adam Moffett <dmmoff...@gmail.com> >>>>> *Sent:* Tuesday, January 20, 2015 1:13 PM >>>>> *To:* af@afmug.com >>>>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] EPMP Minimum System Specs <rant> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> http://www.netmarketshare.com/browser-market-share.aspx?qprid=2&qpcustomd=0 >>>>> >>>>> According to that everyone still uses Internet Explorer. I promise >>>>> I'm as shocked as you are. >>>>> >>>>> Everyone uses Chrome nowadays. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Josh Luthman >>>>> Office: 937-552-2340 >>>>> Direct: 937-552-2343 >>>>> 1100 Wayne St >>>>> Suite 1337 >>>>> Troy, OH 45373 >>>>> >>>>> On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 2:05 PM, Jeremy <jeremysmi...@gmail.com> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Example: Powercode mostly loads and then seems to hang for quite >>>>>> awhile on Firefox, but loads fast on Chrome. >>>>>> >>>>>> On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 12:04 PM, Jeremy <jeremysmi...@gmail.com> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> I've never used EPMP but I have noticed some interfaces lag on one >>>>>>> browser and not on another. What browser is everyone using when they >>>>>>> see >>>>>>> lag? What browser are those of you who aren't seeing lag using? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 11:59 AM, Ken Hohhof <af...@kwisp.com> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Good job of merging 2 threads! You win one free Internet! >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> *From:* Chuck McCown <ch...@wbmfg.com> >>>>>>>> *Sent:* Tuesday, January 20, 2015 12:48 PM >>>>>>>> *To:* af@afmug.com >>>>>>>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] EPMP Minimum System Specs <rant> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Yeah but you bought the advantage GUI license, right? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> *From:* Sean Heskett <af...@zirkel.us> >>>>>>>> *Sent:* Tuesday, January 20, 2015 11:45 AM >>>>>>>> *To:* af@afmug.com >>>>>>>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] EPMP Minimum System Specs <rant> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> less than 5 seconds on my iPhone as well. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 11:43 AM, Josh Luthman < >>>>>>>> j...@imaginenetworksllc.com> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I doubt that 4 of my high end machines all have the same problem. >>>>>>>>> The interface takes too long when it first shows up. Maybe it's >>>>>>>>> because it >>>>>>>>> gets all the information at once, maybe not. Don't care. I want it >>>>>>>>> to be >>>>>>>>> more smooth and faster. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> My phone (Droid Maxx) is one of the most recent models for >>>>>>>>> Android. The interface is terribly slow and clumsy on that. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Well if you feel a poor technology choice was the cause, that's >>>>>>>>> fine, but it's just flat out wrong. I don't want to carry a big fat >>>>>>>>> i7 >>>>>>>>> laptop up the tower when I could just simply use my phone. It works >>>>>>>>> with >>>>>>>>> Ubiquiti, FSK Cambium, Tranzeo, Trango, Mikrotik, etc it should only >>>>>>>>> make >>>>>>>>> sense the one product with a clumsy interface needs fixed instead of >>>>>>>>> changing my devices that work with the competitors products (as well >>>>>>>>> as >>>>>>>>> different products under their portfolio). >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Josh Luthman >>>>>>>>> Office: 937-552-2340 >>>>>>>>> Direct: 937-552-2343 >>>>>>>>> 1100 Wayne St >>>>>>>>> Suite 1337 >>>>>>>>> Troy, OH 45373 >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 1:36 PM, Sean Heskett <af...@zirkel.us> >>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> i'm just stating that on all of our computers i've never seen the >>>>>>>>>> ePMP page load slowly. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> maybe it's a computer problem and not a device problem, just >>>>>>>>>> trying to bring valid input to the discussion. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 11:34 AM, Josh Luthman < >>>>>>>>>> j...@imaginenetworksllc.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Why are you/others arguing that the speed is just fine? This >>>>>>>>>>> doesn't even make sense. There are people with slower laptops that >>>>>>>>>>> work >>>>>>>>>>> with other modern devices and epmp is the only interface that loads >>>>>>>>>>> slow. >>>>>>>>>>> There's no point in arguing peoples valid complaints. Are you >>>>>>>>>>> trying to >>>>>>>>>>> direct the engineers attention to something else? >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Josh Luthman >>>>>>>>>>> Office: 937-552-2340 >>>>>>>>>>> Direct: 937-552-2343 >>>>>>>>>>> 1100 Wayne St >>>>>>>>>>> Suite 1337 >>>>>>>>>>> Troy, OH 45373 >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 1:30 PM, Mike Hammett <af...@ics-il.net> >>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Three, maybe four seconds to load the initial screen and then >>>>>>>>>>>> two maybe three seconds to login. As I doubt a screen capture will >>>>>>>>>>>> work >>>>>>>>>>>> when I'm RDPed in, I'll record the entire login process when I get >>>>>>>>>>>> home and >>>>>>>>>>>> post it up on YouTube. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> ----- >>>>>>>>>>>> Mike Hammett >>>>>>>>>>>> Intelligent Computing Solutions >>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.ics-il.com >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> ------------------------------ >>>>>>>>>>>> *From: *"Josh Luthman" <j...@imaginenetworksllc.com> >>>>>>>>>>>> *To: *af@afmug.com >>>>>>>>>>>> *Sent: *Tuesday, January 20, 2015 12:26:09 PM >>>>>>>>>>>> *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] EPMP Minimum System Specs <rant> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Login takes forever. The first like 10-15 seconds just load >>>>>>>>>>>> and load and load. Once you're in, it's acceptable in terms of >>>>>>>>>>>> page >>>>>>>>>>>> rendering. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Josh Luthman >>>>>>>>>>>> Office: 937-552-2340 >>>>>>>>>>>> Direct: 937-552-2343 >>>>>>>>>>>> 1100 Wayne St >>>>>>>>>>>> Suite 1337 >>>>>>>>>>>> Troy, OH 45373 >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 1:22 PM, Sean Heskett <af...@zirkel.us> >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> we use macbook pro's and the ePMP GUI has never been slow for >>>>>>>>>>>>> us. It was UGLY, but they fixed that with version 2.0 haha. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> not sure why everyone says it's slow tho because we've never >>>>>>>>>>>>> seen it. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> 2 cents >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> -sean >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 9:57 AM, Nate Burke < >>>>>>>>>>>>> n...@blastcomm.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ok, Cambium, this is a little sad. My Field Laptop, a Lenovo >>>>>>>>>>>>>> S10-3t, Atom Processor with Windows 8.1 cannot load the EPMP WEB >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Pages in a >>>>>>>>>>>>>> timely manner. We're talking 40-60 seconds for initial load, >>>>>>>>>>>>>> and 20-30 >>>>>>>>>>>>>> seconds per screen refresh/menu change. Since I'm going to have >>>>>>>>>>>>>> to go to >>>>>>>>>>>>>> the boss, and tell him that I need a new laptop to do any field >>>>>>>>>>>>>> troubleshooting for these new radios, what are the minimum >>>>>>>>>>>>>> system specs for >>>>>>>>>>>>>> a machine to view the EPMP Screens? Unless Cambium is going to >>>>>>>>>>>>>> get their >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Web interface under control as of Yesterday. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> They still swear that the GUI was all developed in house and >>>>>>>>>>>>>> not purchased (something I still can't believe). I'd like to >>>>>>>>>>>>>> know who the >>>>>>>>>>>>>> engineers/managers are who signed off on that design. I can >>>>>>>>>>>>>> only imaging >>>>>>>>>>>>>> that there was a group of guys sitting around the conference >>>>>>>>>>>>>> table, >>>>>>>>>>>>>> watching the presentation on the GUI on the projector up front, >>>>>>>>>>>>>> all nodding >>>>>>>>>>>>>> their heads in agreement, "I think this is a wonderful layout, >>>>>>>>>>>>>> the field >>>>>>>>>>>>>> tech's won't mind waiting a couple extra minutes for the pages >>>>>>>>>>>>>> to load so >>>>>>>>>>>>>> they can look this pretty!!" >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I think that Cambium should step up and get engineers from >>>>>>>>>>>>>> ALL aspects of product development out into the field. 40 >>>>>>>>>>>>>> seconds waiting >>>>>>>>>>>>>> for the page to load is fine when you're sitting in the office, >>>>>>>>>>>>>> but not >>>>>>>>>>>>>> when you have the laptop balanced on a stack of firewood in the >>>>>>>>>>>>>> freezing >>>>>>>>>>>>>> rain trying to get to the monitoring page to see why a radio >>>>>>>>>>>>>> isn't linking >>>>>>>>>>>>>> up. I think that every WISP on this list would be more than >>>>>>>>>>>>>> happy to host >>>>>>>>>>>>>> an engineer for a day. Heck, even if they go into the parking >>>>>>>>>>>>>> lot and >>>>>>>>>>>>>> assemble it on the tailgate of someone's Pickup, they'll get >>>>>>>>>>>>>> some idea of >>>>>>>>>>>>>> what we experience. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have a feeling that if all steps of the Dev process took a >>>>>>>>>>>>>> week in the field, We'd have a radio that had a GUI that >>>>>>>>>>>>>> responded >>>>>>>>>>>>>> instantly on any device, and radios that assembled and mounted >>>>>>>>>>>>>> (and >>>>>>>>>>>>>> unmounted) with 1 gloved hand. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> </rant> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Nate >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> -- >>>> Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity. >>>> >>> >>> >>
