Our packet loss and speed issues went away when we replaced
toughswitches with netonix switches. I think toughswitches have an
issue with buffers and flow control.
On 2/14/2015 9:47 PM, Craig House wrote:
I was reading about it on Streakwave site but it doesn't give that
much info. They are only 100.00 more and have 8 more ports. I think
that make them worth it and I have too heard that they are better
switches with less packet loss and better performance.
Craig
------------------------------------------------------------------------
*From: *"TJ Trout" <[email protected]>
*To: *[email protected]
*Sent: *Saturday, February 14, 2015 9:44:27 PM
*Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] Netonix switch
their website explains it well, but basically you can either do off,
or 24v, 24VH, 48v, 48vh on the ports, 24vh is for af5x and 48vh is for
af24/af5/saf, etc. I haven't used any yet (no dc available) but I've
read they are better than toughswitches
On Sat, Feb 14, 2015 at 7:41 PM, Craig House <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Who is using them? Better than UBNT Toughswitch? Are the ports
all both 24 or 48v like the tough switch and can they be turned on
/ off for POE or are they on POE all the time?
thanks
Craig
