Understood. Yes, it's lineage of the PHY is WLAN. Our lineage is WMAN. Which is 
more aligned with what you do is my question Shayne.
Patrick Leary
M 727.501.3735
[cid:image001.png@01D05730.A60BC3E0]<http://mkt2.us/TelrdNet>





From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Shayne Lebrun
Sent: Thursday, March 05, 2015 10:23 AM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] New feedback (Patrick Leary)

Note that Cambium radios are, with two excpetions off the top of my head, SDR.  
In theory, Cambium could reprogram a 450 SM to talk 802.11 if they wanted.

ePMP are not SDR.  They have an 802.11 chip, and they will never not speak a 
dialect of 802.11.

When they were originally talking about their WiMAX offerings, there was talk 
that it would eventually have a non-WiMAX firmware load.  I.E. would be SDR.  
Then they rebranded some Gemtek radios, and told people to stop asking about a 
'Canopy' protocol firmware load.  In other  words, not SDR.

From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Patrick Leary
Sent: Wednesday, March 4, 2015 2:27 PM
To: af@afmug.com<mailto:af@afmug.com>
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] New feedback (Patrick Leary)

That's the understanding of the term that I share. Thank you Jon.

Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE DROID
On Mar 4, 2015 2:15 PM, Jon Auer <j...@tapodi.net<mailto:j...@tapodi.net>> 
wrote:
Purewave claiming SDR because they can add proprietary extensions seems like 
Ubiquiti claiming to be SDR because they licensed Atheros driver code so they 
could make AirMax.

I always thought SDR meant the signal processing, anything to do with making 
sense of the RF, happened in software (FPGA counts!). Ettus Research's USRP is 
a example on TX/RX. RTL-SDR USB sticks on the RX only.
E.g. If, in theory, the manufacturer can reprogram it to be a FM radio (maybe 
you replace the transciever/amps first though).

On Wed, Mar 4, 2015 at 12:43 PM, Ken Hohhof 
<af...@kwisp.com<mailto:af...@kwisp.com>> wrote:
Why is it not software defined?  Because DAN owned the core WIMAX software? 
Purewave claimed to have purchased the rights to make their own mods, that was 
one of their claimed advantages over PMP320.  Not sure what Mercury would say 
now.  But don't they have a proprietary enhanced (but not LTE) version now?  I 
don't see how they do that if it's not a SDR.

I assume we are talking about the part of Purewave that went to Mercury, not 
the part that went to Redline.

If you mean was it designed to do both WIMAX and LTE with just a different 
software load, no, they never claimed that AFAIK.


-----Original Message----- From: Stefan Englhardt
Sent: Wednesday, March 04, 2015 12:30 PM
To: af@afmug.com<mailto:af@afmug.com>
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] New feedback (Patrick Leary)

PW is not SDR based

So call their Distributors and tell them to change their announcements.
Just google Purwave and SDR and you find some.






************************************************************************************
This footnote confirms that this email message has been scanned by
PineApp Mail-SeCure for the presence of malicious code, vandals & computer 
viruses.
************************************************************************************




************************************************************************************
This footnote confirms that this email message has been scanned by
PineApp Mail-SeCure for the presence of malicious code, vandals & computer 
viruses.
************************************************************************************




************************************************************************************
This footnote confirms that this email message has been scanned by
PineApp Mail-SeCure for the presence of malicious code, vandals & computer 
viruses.
************************************************************************************



************************************************************************************
This footnote confirms that this email message has been scanned by
PineApp Mail-SeCure for the presence of malicious code, vandals & computer 
viruses.
************************************************************************************



Reply via email to