Only a couple weeks left to arrive within this month. Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Mar 11, 2015 9:25 PM, "Mike Hammett" <af...@ics-il.net> wrote:
> Except that you knew they wouldn't ship until this month sometime. > > > > ----- > Mike Hammett > Intelligent Computing Solutions > http://www.ics-il.com > > ------------------------------ > *From: *"Josh Luthman" <j...@imaginenetworksllc.com> > *To: *af@afmug.com > *Sent: *Wednesday, March 11, 2015 8:24:02 PM > *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] A note on ePMP 2.4 PTP mode > > I ordered one a month ago. Still haven't seen it. > > Josh Luthman > Office: 937-552-2340 > Direct: 937-552-2343 > 1100 Wayne St > Suite 1337 > Troy, OH 45373 > On Mar 11, 2015 9:21 PM, "Chuck Macenski" <ch...@macenski.com> wrote: > >> You know you want one! >> >> All airFiber 5X radios come with GPS sync (we even include a GPS antenna >> and mount in the box). >> >> Chuck >> >> On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 7:50 PM, George Skorup (Cyber Broadcasting) < >> geo...@cbcast.com> wrote: >> >>> The only reason to use it right now is because of the GigE interface >>> and 802.3af power ability. >>> >>> So come on Cambium, don't make me buy AirFiber 5X's. >>> >>> On 3/11/2015 7:19 PM, Mathew Howard wrote: >>> >>> Yes! If the force110 PTP will get a PTP-only sync ability at some point, >>> I'm going to start using them everywhere even if I don't actually sync. as >>> they are now, I'm not sure it's worth spending the extra money over just >>> using a standard force110. >>> >>> On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 5:58 PM, George Skorup (Cyber Broadcasting) < >>> geo...@cbcast.com> wrote: >>> >>>> Yeah, if I'm going to buy the 110PTP radio, which we know is the Sync >>>> radio with it disabled!, then let me do PTP-only WITH sync. I can >>>> understand they don't want us buying the PTP radio at half the price and >>>> someone figuring out how to hack it into an AP. For PTP links, I would >>>> spend the extra $ for the PTP radio whether I need the sync or not, may >>>> need it in the future, so why not put it up now. And I'm talking both ends, >>>> you never know if you have to swap masters for timing. >>>> >>>> On 3/11/2015 5:13 PM, Mathew Howard wrote: >>>> >>>> I know... I was told they were looking into doing just that. >>>> >>>> On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 4:30 PM, Josh Luthman < >>>> j...@imaginenetworksllc.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> It's software limited to not do sync. I'd like to see it limited to >>>>> being only a PTP, just allow the sync. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Josh Luthman >>>>> Office: 937-552-2340 >>>>> Direct: 937-552-2343 >>>>> 1100 Wayne St >>>>> Suite 1337 >>>>> Troy, OH 45373 >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 5:17 PM, Mathew Howard <mhoward...@gmail.com> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> There was some talk of enabling GPS sync on the eForce PTP110, is >>>>>> that something that is going to happen? with the 2.5ms frame, we should >>>>>> get >>>>>> latency closer to what flexible mode does, correct? >>>>>> >>>>>> On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 3:55 PM, Josh Luthman < >>>>>> j...@imaginenetworksllc.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> But the force110ptp can't sync so it should always do ePTP? PTP >>>>>>> being possibly better if you have a large scale of synced backhauls I >>>>>>> suppose. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Josh Luthman >>>>>>> Office: 937-552-2340 >>>>>>> Direct: 937-552-2343 >>>>>>> 1100 Wayne St >>>>>>> Suite 1337 >>>>>>> Troy, OH 45373 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 4:52 PM, Dan Sullivan < >>>>>>> daniel.sulli...@cambiumnetworks.com> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Hi Matt, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> ePTP does not support GPS sync as there is no fixed frame. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> PTP mode is TDD based and does support GPS Sync. The 2.5 msec >>>>>>>> frame also will support GPS Sync. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Dan Sullivan >>>>>>>> ePMP Software Manager >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>>>>> From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Matt >>>>>>>> Sent: Wednesday, March 11, 2015 3:17 PM >>>>>>>> To: af@afmug.com >>>>>>>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] A note on ePMP 2.4 PTP mode >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> > Just a quick note on the enhanced PTP mode of operation - >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > You will see lower latency in most deployments as compared to the >>>>>>>> TDD & Flex mode of operation. However, in high interference coupled >>>>>>>> with >>>>>>>> long distance environments the flexible mode will do better in terms of >>>>>>>> tput. >>>>>>>> > At this time, this is per design but we will be addressing and >>>>>>>> incorporating some of the good stuff from our TDD/Flex mode of >>>>>>>> operation >>>>>>>> into the enhanced PTP to bring back the tput in the above conditions. >>>>>>>> > Please note that we are also working on a 2.5ms frame to reduce >>>>>>>> latency in the PMP mode of operation. >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > Thanks >>>>>>>> > Sakid >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Looking at ePMP in 5ghz for PTP. Is there a way to do it WITH GPS >>>>>>>> sync to allow frequency reuse for PTP yet? Running out of 5ghz >>>>>>>> spectrum. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >> >
