Awesome.
On 3/12/2015 9:42 AM, John Butler wrote:
We plan to enable GPS Sync for a single “SM” connected (i.e. a PTP
link) in a software update coming in the near future.
It will be a software update to any Force 110 PTP radios that have
been purchased.
*From:*Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *George Skorup
(Cyber Broadcasting)
*Sent:* Wednesday, March 11, 2015 7:51 PM
*To:* af@afmug.com
*Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] A note on ePMP 2.4 PTP mode
The only reason to use it right now is because of the GigE interface
and 802.3af power ability.
So come on Cambium, don't make me buy AirFiber 5X's.
On 3/11/2015 7:19 PM, Mathew Howard wrote:
Yes! If the force110 PTP will get a PTP-only sync ability at some
point, I'm going to start using them everywhere even if I don't
actually sync. as they are now, I'm not sure it's worth spending
the extra money over just using a standard force110.
On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 5:58 PM, George Skorup (Cyber
Broadcasting) <geo...@cbcast.com <mailto:geo...@cbcast.com>> wrote:
Yeah, if I'm going to buy the 110PTP radio, which we know is the
Sync radio with it disabled!, then let me do PTP-only WITH sync. I
can understand they don't want us buying the PTP radio at half the
price and someone figuring out how to hack it into an AP. For PTP
links, I would spend the extra $ for the PTP radio whether I need
the sync or not, may need it in the future, so why not put it up
now. And I'm talking both ends, you never know if you have to swap
masters for timing.
On 3/11/2015 5:13 PM, Mathew Howard wrote:
I know... I was told they were looking into doing just that.
On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 4:30 PM, Josh Luthman
<j...@imaginenetworksllc.com
<mailto:j...@imaginenetworksllc.com>> wrote:
It's software limited to not do sync. I'd like to see it
limited to being only a PTP, just allow the sync.
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340 <tel:937-552-2340>
Direct: 937-552-2343 <tel:937-552-2343>
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 5:17 PM, Mathew Howard
<mhoward...@gmail.com <mailto:mhoward...@gmail.com>> wrote:
There was some talk of enabling GPS sync on the eForce PTP110,
is that something that is going to happen? with the 2.5ms
frame, we should get latency closer to what flexible mode
does, correct?
On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 3:55 PM, Josh Luthman
<j...@imaginenetworksllc.com
<mailto:j...@imaginenetworksllc.com>> wrote:
But the force110ptp can't sync so it should always do
ePTP? PTP being possibly better if you have a large scale
of synced backhauls I suppose.
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340 <tel:937-552-2340>
Direct: 937-552-2343 <tel:937-552-2343>
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 4:52 PM, Dan Sullivan
<daniel.sulli...@cambiumnetworks.com
<mailto:daniel.sulli...@cambiumnetworks.com>> wrote:
Hi Matt,
ePTP does not support GPS sync as there is no fixed frame.
PTP mode is TDD based and does support GPS Sync. The
2.5 msec frame also will support GPS Sync.
Dan Sullivan
ePMP Software Manager
-----Original Message-----
From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com
<mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com>] On Behalf Of Matt
Sent: Wednesday, March 11, 2015 3:17 PM
To: af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com>
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] A note on ePMP 2.4 PTP mode
> Just a quick note on the enhanced PTP mode of
operation -
>
> You will see lower latency in most deployments as
compared to the TDD & Flex mode of operation. However,
in high interference coupled with long distance
environments the flexible mode will do better in terms
of tput.
> At this time, this is per design but we will be
addressing and incorporating some of the good stuff
from our TDD/Flex mode of operation into the enhanced
PTP to bring back the tput in the above conditions.
> Please note that we are also working on a 2.5ms
frame to reduce latency in the PMP mode of operation.
>
> Thanks
> Sakid
Looking at ePMP in 5ghz for PTP. Is there a way to do
it WITH GPS sync to allow frequency reuse for PTP
yet? Running out of 5ghz spectrum.
