Yeah, but I don't really see us using these too much where we actually need more than 100mbps anyway... the 802.3af support does have the nice side effect of making them work with a power supply setup for UBNT stuff though.
On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 7:50 PM, George Skorup (Cyber Broadcasting) < geo...@cbcast.com> wrote: > The only reason to use it right now is because of the GigE interface and > 802.3af power ability. > > So come on Cambium, don't make me buy AirFiber 5X's. > > On 3/11/2015 7:19 PM, Mathew Howard wrote: > > Yes! If the force110 PTP will get a PTP-only sync ability at some point, > I'm going to start using them everywhere even if I don't actually sync. as > they are now, I'm not sure it's worth spending the extra money over just > using a standard force110. > > On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 5:58 PM, George Skorup (Cyber Broadcasting) < > geo...@cbcast.com> wrote: > >> Yeah, if I'm going to buy the 110PTP radio, which we know is the Sync >> radio with it disabled!, then let me do PTP-only WITH sync. I can >> understand they don't want us buying the PTP radio at half the price and >> someone figuring out how to hack it into an AP. For PTP links, I would >> spend the extra $ for the PTP radio whether I need the sync or not, may >> need it in the future, so why not put it up now. And I'm talking both ends, >> you never know if you have to swap masters for timing. >> >> On 3/11/2015 5:13 PM, Mathew Howard wrote: >> >> I know... I was told they were looking into doing just that. >> >> On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 4:30 PM, Josh Luthman < >> j...@imaginenetworksllc.com> wrote: >> >>> It's software limited to not do sync. I'd like to see it limited to >>> being only a PTP, just allow the sync. >>> >>> >>> Josh Luthman >>> Office: 937-552-2340 >>> Direct: 937-552-2343 >>> 1100 Wayne St >>> Suite 1337 >>> Troy, OH 45373 >>> >>> On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 5:17 PM, Mathew Howard <mhoward...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> There was some talk of enabling GPS sync on the eForce PTP110, is that >>>> something that is going to happen? with the 2.5ms frame, we should get >>>> latency closer to what flexible mode does, correct? >>>> >>>> On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 3:55 PM, Josh Luthman < >>>> j...@imaginenetworksllc.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> But the force110ptp can't sync so it should always do ePTP? PTP being >>>>> possibly better if you have a large scale of synced backhauls I suppose. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Josh Luthman >>>>> Office: 937-552-2340 >>>>> Direct: 937-552-2343 >>>>> 1100 Wayne St >>>>> Suite 1337 >>>>> Troy, OH 45373 >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 4:52 PM, Dan Sullivan < >>>>> daniel.sulli...@cambiumnetworks.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Hi Matt, >>>>>> >>>>>> ePTP does not support GPS sync as there is no fixed frame. >>>>>> >>>>>> PTP mode is TDD based and does support GPS Sync. The 2.5 msec frame >>>>>> also will support GPS Sync. >>>>>> >>>>>> Dan Sullivan >>>>>> ePMP Software Manager >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>>> From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Matt >>>>>> Sent: Wednesday, March 11, 2015 3:17 PM >>>>>> To: af@afmug.com >>>>>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] A note on ePMP 2.4 PTP mode >>>>>> >>>>>> > Just a quick note on the enhanced PTP mode of operation - >>>>>> > >>>>>> > You will see lower latency in most deployments as compared to the >>>>>> TDD & Flex mode of operation. However, in high interference coupled with >>>>>> long distance environments the flexible mode will do better in terms of >>>>>> tput. >>>>>> > At this time, this is per design but we will be addressing and >>>>>> incorporating some of the good stuff from our TDD/Flex mode of operation >>>>>> into the enhanced PTP to bring back the tput in the above conditions. >>>>>> > Please note that we are also working on a 2.5ms frame to reduce >>>>>> latency in the PMP mode of operation. >>>>>> > >>>>>> > Thanks >>>>>> > Sakid >>>>>> >>>>>> Looking at ePMP in 5ghz for PTP. Is there a way to do it WITH GPS >>>>>> sync to allow frequency reuse for PTP yet? Running out of 5ghz spectrum. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> >> > >
