We just install a RSD-300B-24 on all of our sites and then feed that into
the fuse block. They are like a hundred bucks. I don't like feeding 28.3v
into anything 24v.
On Sun, Mar 22, 2015 at 1:09 PM, Bill Prince <part15...@gmail.com> wrote:
> It would be nice to know if it could handle 25, 26, 27, 28, or 29 volts.
>
> A lot of us have solar and/or DC plant installations that use unregulated
> 24 volts. So bulk charging could be up around 28+ volts. In the past, we've
> resorted to installing a DC-DC converter to ensure that "sensitive"
> equipment does not let the smoke out (UBNT is on my shit list as being
> "mostly" sensitive).
>
> I like keeping my POPs simple, but I also do not like to let the smoke out.
>
> bp
> <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>
>
>
> On 3/22/2015 11:53 AM, Chuck Macenski wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I do not know the voltage spec off the top of my head; we really only
> support the included 24V PoE. I do know that 48V is too high and will not
> work. At 24V, I believe the power draw is under 15 Watts; that consumption
> goes up if the supplied voltage drops significantly below 24V.
>
> Chuck
>
> On Sun, Mar 22, 2015 at 10:48 AM, Ken Hohhof <af...@kwisp.com> wrote:
>
>> Well, it’s a fairly straightforward question. Whereas they could feel
>> the Tx and Rx specs depend on a lot of factors, making the question
>> complicated to answer.
>>
>> So let’s try.
>>
>> Chuck, Ben, or whoever from the airFiber team at Ubiquiti reads this
>> list. Pretty please, could you tell us the min/max POE voltage for the
>> airFiber 5X?
>>
>> If nothing else, those of us who are OK with 24V nominal probably would
>> like to know if 30V would let the magic smoke out, since we have DC sites
>> where the radios run off batteries.
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* Mike Hammett <af...@ics-il.net>
>> *Sent:* Sunday, March 22, 2015 10:28 AM
>> *To:* af@afmug.com
>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] splain the AC ubnt line
>>
>> They won't even tell you the Tx power or RX sensitivity, so voltage
>> range I'm sure is out of the question.
>>
>>
>>
>> -----
>> Mike Hammett
>> Intelligent Computing Solutions
>> http://www.ics-il.com
>>
>> <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL>
>> <https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb>
>> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions>
>> <https://twitter.com/ICSIL>
>>
>> ------------------------------
>> *From: *"Ken Hohhof" <af...@kwisp.com>
>> *To: *af@afmug.com
>> *Sent: *Sunday, March 22, 2015 10:25:16 AM
>> *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] splain the AC ubnt line
>>
>> Mike, have you asked them for a voltage spec? If it turned out to
>> accept 20-60V you’d probably change your mind and say that is brilliant.
>>
>> *From:* Jeremy <jeremysmi...@gmail.com>
>> *Sent:* Sunday, March 22, 2015 10:05 AM
>> *To:* af@afmug.com
>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] splain the AC ubnt line
>>
>> 24v works way better for me. All my sites are 24v. I have to
>> upconvert to 48v when needed. There is no easy fix because I cannot fit
>> two more batteries in my cabinet, and it would be a total rework even if I
>> could. So it was me and the ten or so that I'll buy. Thanks UBNT!
>>
>> On Sun, Mar 22, 2015 at 8:03 AM, Mike Hammett <af...@ics-il.net> wrote:
>>
>>> Everything UBNT has says carrier.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> -----
>>> Mike Hammett
>>> Intelligent Computing Solutions
>>> http://www.ics-il.com
>>>
>>> <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL>
>>> <https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb>
>>> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions>
>>> <https://twitter.com/ICSIL>
>>>
>>> ------------------------------
>>> *From: *"Ken Hohhof" <af...@kwisp.com>
>>> *To: *af@afmug.com
>>> *Sent: *Sunday, March 22, 2015 8:57:46 AM
>>>
>>> *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] splain the AC ubnt line
>>>
>>> Or, ya know, somebody might have asked for it, and wanted to buy a
>>> million units, and already had 24V at their remote small cell cabinets, or
>>> something like that. The description does say carrier backhaul radio,
>>> maybe that’s a hint.
>>>
>>> WISPs in the US are one market for Ubiquiti, not the only market. It’s
>>> possible this decision makes great sense and the reason isn’t apparent from
>>> our/your perspective.
>>>
>>>
>>> *From:* Mike Hammett <af...@ics-il.net>
>>> *Sent:* Sunday, March 22, 2015 8:03 AM
>>> *To:* af@afmug.com
>>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] splain the AC ubnt line
>>>
>>> 24v... because UBNT must do something to fuck up a product. Just use
>>> 48v on everything! First three products use essentially 48v... . than
>>> let's do a 24... because!
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> -----
>>> Mike Hammett
>>> Intelligent Computing Solutions
>>> http://www.ics-il.com
>>>
>>> <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL>
>>> <https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb>
>>> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions>
>>> <https://twitter.com/ICSIL>
>>>
>>> ------------------------------
>>> *From: *"Bill Prince" <part15...@gmail.com>
>>> *To: *af@afmug.com
>>> *Sent: *Saturday, March 21, 2015 10:18:57 AM
>>> *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] splain the AC ubnt line
>>>
>>> I notice that the AF5X does not have a power consumption value. The
>>> data sheet is no help except that it says the thing uses 24V 1a POE
>>> injector. That implies a maximum of 24 watts. So less than 24 watts.
>>> Anyone have one installed that has measured actual power consumption? If
>>> they're running the POE at 50% duty cycle, that would suggest about 12
>>> watts.
>>>
>>> bp
>>> <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 3/21/2015 7:11 AM, Ty Featherling wrote:
>>>
>>> I did Bill with a little help. I posted it here and ok the UBNT list
>>> awhile back but no one seemed to notice. I intend to keep adding to it
>>> based on input from the community.
>>>
>>> -Ty
>>> On Mar 20, 2015 10:41 PM, "Bill Prince" <part15...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hot damn! Who made that?!?
>>>>
>>>> bp
>>>> <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 3/20/2015 8:13 PM, Ty Featherling wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Oops let's try again. How about this chart...
>>>> ubnt radio comparison
>>>> <https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/10BwvYDqrI4D8nmDRaNtfCeou0j2uZPMGIfXf9GB-cCc/edit?usp=drivesdk>
>>>>
>>>> -Ty
>>>> On Mar 20, 2015 10:12 PM, "Ty Featherling" <tyfeatherl...@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Try this chart.
>>>>> On Mar 20, 2015 6:07 PM, "Ken Hohhof" <af...@kwisp.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Yes, charts are always good. Especially if the chart would also
>>>>>> have checkmarks for which U-NII bands they are currently approved for.
>>>>>> And
>>>>>> what power they take.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *From:* Ben Moore <ben.mo...@ubnt.com>
>>>>>> *Sent:* Friday, March 20, 2015 5:51 PM
>>>>>> *To:* af@afmug.com
>>>>>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] splain the AC ubnt line
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Yes, we do have too many variants. It is being streamlined in the
>>>>>> AC line with NanoBeam, Powerbeam (still will have multiple sizes).
>>>>>>
>>>>>> NanoBeam = all integrated
>>>>>> PowerBeam = inner feed/dish design
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It is a challenge with sku's since may sku's are needed for different
>>>>>> areas of the world (i.e. some products are very popular here and not as
>>>>>> popular in other parts of the world).
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Would chart help?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 4:43 PM, Ken Hohhof <af...@kwisp.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Ben, you guys have too many product variants, and in some cases
>>>>>>> need better naming. Like NanoBridge, NanoBeam, PowerBeam, NanoBeam AC,
>>>>>>> PowerBeam AC. I honestly don’t understand the difference between a
>>>>>>> NanoBeam and a PowerBeam, or why one has models by antenna gain in dB
>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>> the other by antenna size in mm.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> And of course the NanoStation Loco, why is it Loco? Because it’s
>>>>>>> crazy small?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Then there’s the M vs W thing.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> My head hurts.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> *From:* Ben Moore <ben.mo...@ubnt.com>
>>>>>>> *Sent:* Friday, March 20, 2015 4:13 PM
>>>>>>> *To:* af@afmug.com
>>>>>>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] splain the AC ubnt line
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Here you go:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Lite - No airPrism, will do PTP and PTMP
>>>>>>> PTP - PTP only, airPrism
>>>>>>> PTMP - PTMP only, airPrism
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> These are split due to the filtering used for each (maximize PTP and
>>>>>>> PTMP performance). We won't split unless there is a performance reason
>>>>>>> to. The cost is same either way...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> How much is the budget? Consider AF-5X?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 3:02 PM, That One Guy <
>>>>>>> thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The current iteractions of the rocket AC line, these are the only
>>>>>>>> connectorized units?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> What are the differences between lite, ptp, and ptmp airprism only?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Are some of these shipping without all there guts?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I am looking at replacing an old shitbucket tranzeo link, we
>>>>>>>> already have it connected to one pol of a set of radiowaves 2 foot HP
>>>>>>>> parabolics. I figure its worth checking out these AC radios, but I dont
>>>>>>>> know whats what now, is this a permanent separation with UBNT of ptp
>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>> ptmp or is this two things that are going to converge?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Other than the Ac component, for a low throughput demand link is
>>>>>>>> there any major benefit of going to the AC over the M5 in terms of
>>>>>>>> performance? (future demand is a factor as well)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Also considering the epmp, goods, bads uglies between the three
>>>>>>>> products there?
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see
>>>>>>>> your team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the
>>>>>>>> team.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
