Perhaps, but at 1000x the cost. On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 8:21 PM, Adam Moffett <dmmoff...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I'd suggest with careful spectrum management, proper loading, AND better > equipment you'd still be better off. > > I have 22 towers with over a hundred UBNT APs in a valley 11 miles wide, > built over the top of a synced Canopy network. I take about 10 customers a > week off of their 450 platform and we are constantly told that the > difference is night and day better on our network. Careful spectrum > management and proper AP loading wins over sync every time. > > On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 8:11 PM, Mathew Howard <mhoward...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> No, we can't always control that, but if I can at least control it >> sometimes, I'll take it. >> >> On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 8:48 PM, Josh Reynolds <j...@spitwspots.com> >> wrote: >> >>> And you have the opinion you can control that, constantly, on >>> unlicensed spectrum? >>> >>> *smirk* >>> >>> Josh Reynolds >>> CIO, SPITwSPOTSwww.spitwspots.com >>> >>> On 05/15/2015 05:46 PM, Mathew Howard wrote: >>> >>> That's a very good point, regardless of what some customers seem to >>> think, mbps really isn't the most important thing... >>> >>> On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 8:41 PM, Adam Moffett <dmmoff...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> I've always considered mbps to be among the least important concerns >>>> on PTMP, well below packet loss, jitter, QoS features, manageability, >>>> consistency, and reliability. Which is why I'm not super keen on *any* of >>>> the wifi stuff. This seems is like an argument about whether a Pinto is >>>> better than a Fiesta. >>>> </smug> >>>> >>>> One could say "I can sync but I can only get 60 Mbps per sub" (*) >>>> >>>> Another person could say "I can't sync but I can get 200+ Mbps per sub" >>>> (*) >>>> >>>> (*) under the right conditions >>>> >>>> Your market and deployment strats will dictate which is more important. >>>> >>>> Josh Reynolds >>>> CIO, SPITwSPOTSwww.spitwspots.com >>>> >>>> On 05/15/2015 04:56 PM, SmarterBroadband wrote: >>>> >>>> But no sync. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com <af-boun...@afmug.com>] *On >>>> Behalf Of *Peter Kranz >>>> *Sent:* Friday, May 15, 2015 3:12 PM >>>> *To:* af@afmug.com >>>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] ePMP vs Ubiquiti AC >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> AC blows doors on ePMP >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> *Peter Kranz *www.UnwiredLtd.com <http://www.unwiredltd.com/> >>>> Desk: 510-868-1614 x100 <510-868-1614%20x100> >>>> Mobile: 510-207-0000 >>>> pkr...@unwiredltd.com >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com <af-boun...@afmug.com>] *On >>>> Behalf Of *Jason McKemie >>>> *Sent:* Friday, May 15, 2015 11:21 AM >>>> *To:* af@afmug.com >>>> *Subject:* [AFMUG] ePMP vs Ubiquiti AC >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> I know this isn't an apples to apples comparison, but what are other's >>>> thoughts on these two products? I'm looking at 5GHz, and I know the AC >>>> gear doesn't have the lower 5GHz bands - hopefully they will in the near >>>> future. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -Jason >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >> > >
