I have 22 towers with over a hundred UBNT APs in a valley 11 miles wide, built over the top of a synced Canopy network. I take about 10 customers a week off of their 450 platform and we are constantly told that the difference is night and day better on our network. Careful spectrum management and proper AP loading wins over sync every time.On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 8:11 PM, Mathew Howard <mhoward...@gmail.com <mailto:mhoward...@gmail.com>> wrote:No, we can't always control that, but if I can at least control it sometimes, I'll take it. On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 8:48 PM, Josh Reynolds <j...@spitwspots.com <mailto:j...@spitwspots.com>> wrote: And you have the opinion you can control that, constantly, on unlicensed spectrum? *smirk* Josh Reynolds CIO, SPITwSPOTS www.spitwspots.com <http://www.spitwspots.com> On 05/15/2015 05:46 PM, Mathew Howard wrote:That's a very good point, regardless of what some customers seem to think, mbps really isn't the most important thing... On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 8:41 PM, Adam Moffett <dmmoff...@gmail.com <mailto:dmmoff...@gmail.com>> wrote: I've always considered mbps to be among the least important concerns on PTMP, well below packet loss, jitter, QoS features, manageability, consistency, and reliability. Which is why I'm not super keen on *any* of the wifi stuff. This seems is like an argument about whether a Pinto is better than a Fiesta. </smug>One could say "I can sync but I can only get 60 Mbps per sub" (*) Another person could say "I can't sync but I can get 200+ Mbps per sub" (*) (*) under the right conditions Your market and deployment strats will dictate which is more important. Josh Reynolds CIO, SPITwSPOTS www.spitwspots.com <http://www.spitwspots.com> On 05/15/2015 04:56 PM, SmarterBroadband wrote:But no sync. *From:*Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Peter Kranz *Sent:* Friday, May 15, 2015 3:12 PM *To:* af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] ePMP vs Ubiquiti AC AC blows doors on ePMP *Peter Kranz *www.UnwiredLtd.com <http://www.unwiredltd.com/> Desk: 510-868-1614 x100 <tel:510-868-1614%20x100> Mobile: 510-207-0000 <tel:510-207-0000> pkr...@unwiredltd.com <mailto:pkr...@unwiredltd.com> *From:*Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Jason McKemie *Sent:* Friday, May 15, 2015 11:21 AM *To:* af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com> *Subject:* [AFMUG] ePMP vs Ubiquiti AC I know this isn't an apples to apples comparison, but what are other's thoughts on these two products? I'm looking at 5GHz, and I know the AC gear doesn't have the lower 5GHz bands - hopefully they will in the near future. -Jason
Or put another way...if he's using better equipment but doesn't know how
to use it, then you'll still win.
- Re: [AFMUG] ePMP vs Ubiquiti AC Jaime Solorza
- Re: [AFMUG] ePMP vs Ubiquiti AC Mike Hammett
- Re: [AFMUG] ePMP vs Ubiquiti AC Josh Reynolds
- Re: [AFMUG] ePMP vs Ubiquiti AC Mike Hammett
- Re: [AFMUG] ePMP vs Ubiquiti AC Mike Hammett
- Re: [AFMUG] ePMP vs Ubiquiti AC Mathew Howard
- Re: [AFMUG] ePMP vs Ubiquiti AC Mathew Howard
- Re: [AFMUG] ePMP vs Ubiquiti AC Jeremy
- Re: [AFMUG] ePMP vs Ubiquiti AC Adam Moffett
- Re: [AFMUG] ePMP vs Ubiquiti AC Jeremy
- Re: [AFMUG] ePMP vs Ubiquiti AC Adam Moffett
- Re: [AFMUG] ePMP vs Ubiquiti AC Adam Moffett
- Re: [AFMUG] ePMP vs Ubiquiti AC Mathew Howard
- Re: [AFMUG] ePMP vs Ubiquiti AC Adam Moffett
- Re: [AFMUG] ePMP vs Ubiquiti AC Jason McKemie
- Re: [AFMUG] ePMP vs Ubiquiti AC Ken Hohhof
- Re: [AFMUG] ePMP vs Ubiquiti AC Faisal Imtiaz
- Re: [AFMUG] ePMP vs Ubiquiti AC Faisal Imtiaz
- Re: [AFMUG] ePMP vs Ubiquiti AC Josh Reynolds
- Re: [AFMUG] ePMP vs Ubiquiti AC Stefan Englhardt
- Re: [AFMUG] ePMP vs Ubiquiti AC Josh Reynolds