I wouldn't go into that area unless you can deploy so that you will not be
completely dependent on the locations served by the fiber network (i.e. be
able to serve rural areas as well). As Rory stated, the planned network is
likely not sustainable - but it could put a strain on your customer count
for a while.

-Jason

On Mon, Jul 6, 2015 at 2:10 PM, Christopher Gray <cg...@graytechsoftware.com
> wrote:

> About $40M is grant funding from the state for "last mile" services that
> is only available to municipalities. The balance of the funding is coming
> from town borrowing. My town will receive about $1.2M from the grant and
> will vote in September whether to authorize $2.3M of borrowing that would
> be paid with property tax.
>
> I'm 95% sure this will go through, and the network would be lit in about 3
> years, but I can't get their numbers to work out. I cannot see how they can
> actually provide service and maintain their network and offer a base
> service of only $50 / month. If that jumps to $100, I could see remaining
> competitive, though.
>
>
> On Mon, Jul 6, 2015 at 1:58 PM, Chuck McCown <ch...@wbmfg.com> wrote:
>
>>   Where is the funding coming from?
>> I would not be comfortable building in an area where I am sure to get
>> over built.
>>
>>  *From:* Christopher Gray <cg...@graytechsoftware.com>
>> *Sent:* Monday, July 06, 2015 11:56 AM
>> *To:* af@afmug.com
>> *Subject:* [AFMUG] Plan to Compete with Municipal Fiber?
>>
>>  Several of the rural towns in my planned coverage area are looking into
>> municipal fiber (average density about 10 premises per fiber mile, all
>> above ground). They're claiming $50 for 25 Mbps service, $79 for 100 Mbps,
>> and $109 for 1 Gbps. They already have funding authorized in about half of
>> the towns they are targeting... but they'd be about 3 years from providing
>> any service.
>>
>> Is it reasonable or possible to compete with such a thing? Should I
>> ignore any area that plans to fund this, or might it be worth getting a
>> foothold before their system is lit?
>>
>> Thanks - Chris
>>
>
>

Reply via email to