0A:00:3E is canopy hardware On Mon, Jul 6, 2015 at 1:35 PM, Mike Hammett <af...@ics-il.net> wrote:
> Anyone recognize these MACs on ether3? That OUI isn't in the IEEE OUI > list, so it's not a real, hardware address. > > > [admin@Yorkville Grande Reserve] > /interface bridge host print > Flags: L - local, E - external-fdb > BRIDGE > MAC-ADDRESS > ON-INTERFACE > AGE > L Local > 00:0C:42:75:D7:70 ether1 - > Local > 0s > L Local > 00:0C:42:75:D7:72 > ether3 > 0s > Local > 00:26:B9:D6:61:02 ether1 - > Local > 0s > Local > 0A:00:3E:03:5B:96 > ether3 > 20s > Local > 0A:00:3E:04:6B:5A > ether3 > 1m6s > > > > Production isn't bridged, just sitting here for testing at the moment. > > > > ----- > Mike Hammett > Intelligent Computing Solutions > http://www.ics-il.com > > ------------------------------ > *From: *"Mike Hammett" <af...@ics-il.net> > *To: *af@afmug.com > *Sent: *Monday, July 6, 2015 2:16:33 PM > *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] ePMP no pings > > Down to just one. One of them apparently wasn't upgraded to 2.1 or beyond > yet (2.0) and had the old GUI and IP. > > > > ----- > Mike Hammett > Intelligent Computing Solutions > http://www.ics-il.com > > ------------------------------ > *From: *"Mike Hammett" <af...@ics-il.net> > *To: *"Animal Farm" <af@afmug.com> > *Sent: *Monday, July 6, 2015 1:13:14 PM > *Subject: *[AFMUG] ePMP no pings > > Any of you had any issues with Cambium radios coming up, but not > responding to pings? I tried 169.254.1.1, 192.168.0.1 and 192.168.0.2. > These are all newer than the migration to 169.254. I seem to have three > radios on a tower doing that. > > > > ----- > Mike Hammett > Intelligent Computing Solutions > http://www.ics-il.com > > >