Various software models may have this feature but LinkPlanner does not.  
PathLoss and IQ.Link will take whatever you put in them - if you have both data 
sets (SRTM, NED) you can easily run profiles with each set

-----Original Message-----
From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Adam Moffett
Sent: Wednesday, July 22, 2015 11:31 AM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] NED vs SRTM

Does any of the RF modeling software automatically compare NED with SRTM to 
extrapolate clutter height?  It seems like it would be a straightforward 
feature to add.

On 7/22/2015 8:35 AM, Hardy, Tim wrote:
> Another point to remember:
>
> The end points of an SRTM profile sometimes need to be adjusted downwards (or 
> at the very least, verified) to account for the morphology above terrain that 
> may have been included in the SRTM data.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Brian Webster
> Sent: Tuesday, July 21, 2015 11:22 PM
> To: af@afmug.com
> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] NED vs SRTM
>
> NED is the national elevation dataset and is based on actual ground elevation 
> data and digitized topo maps.
>
> SRTM is a combination of RADAR and LIDAR data from the shuttle missions. They 
> do not reflect actual ground elevation, they are a processed echo return of 
> whatever radar and LIDAR returns that were received on the shuttle.
>
> The source of the data should also be known as to the resolution. SRTM data 
> was published at 30 meter resolution meaning the hard data points are spaced 
> at 30 meter intervals. NED data is available in various resolutions the most 
> common nationwide being 1/3 arc second or 10 meter resolution or actual data 
> points every 10 meters. This produces a much more accurate terrain model 
> which in turn creates much more accurate RF propagation information.
>
> I have attached a real rough paper with images that illustrate the various 
> differences in terrain data and resolution.
>
>
>
> Thank You,
> Brian Webster
> www.wirelessmapping.com
> www.Broadband-Mapping.com
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Adam Moffett
> Sent: Tuesday, July 21, 2015 6:19 PM
> To: af@afmug.com
> Subject: [AFMUG] NED vs SRTM
>
> If there's a 5 meter discrepancy between USGS National Elevation Data and the 
> Shuttle Radar Topography Mission, who would you trust? Would you bet $500 on 
> it?
>
> In this case, with NED I'll have LOS on a backhaul, and with SRTM I'm 
> in the woods.  I'm under the impression that SRTM sometimes gets you 
> treetops rather than the ground.  If I'm wrong I have alternate paths, 
> but I'd have to pay for a new PCN....so it really is a $500 bet. :)
>

Reply via email to