"Carrier Grade" Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Jul 24, 2015 8:17 AM, "Paul Stewart" <[email protected]> wrote:
> Well it will be interesting … sure would be nice to see someone “disrupt” > I agree … but there have been lots of folks try to provide “DPI” and fail > badly as they didn’t really understand what they were getting into… and > doing it on existing routers is usually the first mistake in my opinion….. > > > > > > *From:* Af [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Jason McKemie > *Sent:* Friday, July 24, 2015 1:27 AM > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Ubiquiti DPI? > > > > They've got the resources to do it, would be nice to see someone undercut > the existing players. > > On Thursday, July 23, 2015, Paul Stewart <[email protected]> wrote: > > I have no idea but if it’s like other attempts I’ve seen from companies to > stack heavy CPU “stuff” into a router, then stability and any type of > scaling would be first concerns. DPI is a very complex item to see someone > like Ubiquiti jump into in my opinion… > > > > *From:* Af [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Jeremy > *Sent:* Thursday, July 23, 2015 7:13 PM > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* [AFMUG] Ubiquiti DPI? > > > > Ok, so now that deep packet inspection has been announced I'd assume any > NDAs have been lifted. Have any of you been using this? Any idea what > type of latency is added? That pricing model is a whole lot different from > any DPI tool that I have ever seen.... > >
