Well you'd get in the devs face if it was busted!

Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Jul 23, 2015 10:15 PM, "Matt Hardy" <m...@ubnt.com> wrote:

> I haven't had any issues in our deep-south office ;)
>
> On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 8:54 PM, Josh Luthman <j...@imaginenetworksllc.com
> > wrote:
>
>> Are they all west coast testers?
>>
>> Josh Luthman
>> Office: 937-552-2340
>> Direct: 937-552-2343
>> 1100 Wayne St
>> Suite 1337
>> Troy, OH 45373
>> On Jul 23, 2015 8:33 PM, "Ben Moore" <ben.mo...@ubnt.com> wrote:
>>
>>> OK Thanks.  Please let us know if you test again and any issues.  The
>>> beta customers and customers that have been using since have been happy
>>> (have not heard of other complaints).
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Ben
>>>
>>> On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 6:32 PM, Brett A Mansfield <
>>> li...@silverlakeinternet.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> It was not beta. It was the day 1.7.0 was GA. It is possible that it
>>>> was not the DPI, but it's been stable since I shut off DPI. I never
>>>> contacted support because I've been too busy and DPI is a luxury to me, not
>>>> a necessity.
>>>>
>>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>>
>>>> On Jul 23, 2015, at 6:04 PM, Ben Moore <ben.mo...@ubnt.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi Brett -
>>>>
>>>> Was this while in beta?  What did support have to say with issue?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Ben
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 6:03 PM, Brett A Mansfield <
>>>> li...@silverlakeinternet.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I had dpi running for one day in my ER Pro 8 and it panicked in less
>>>>> that 24 hours. I turned it off and it's been good since.
>>>>>
>>>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>>>
>>>>> > On Jul 23, 2015, at 5:13 PM, Jeremy <jeremysmi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> >
>>>>> > Ok, so now that deep packet inspection has been announced I'd assume
>>>>> any NDAs have been lifted.  Have any of you been using this?  Any idea 
>>>>> what
>>>>> type of latency is added?  That pricing model is a whole lot different 
>>>>> from
>>>>> any DPI tool that I have ever seen....
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>

Reply via email to