When you have the volume and variety of products that ubiquiti does, they can do things that nobody else can do especially when they have some specialized 3rd party developers.
Sent from my iPhone > On Jul 24, 2015, at 8:52 AM, Ken Hohhof <[email protected]> wrote: > > My view is with DPI, like virus scanning or spam filtering, you are buying > the updates as much as the platform. If the signatures and rules aren’t kept > up to date, it loses value. Any vendor that uses this feature to sell > hardware and doesn’t charge a yearly fee may not understand the task. > > > From: Paul Stewart > Sent: Friday, July 24, 2015 7:38 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Ubiquiti DPI? > > LOL … I have a hard time with that term being used with Ubiquiti ;) > > From: Af [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Josh Luthman > Sent: Friday, July 24, 2015 8:30 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Ubiquiti DPI? > > "Carrier Grade" > > Josh Luthman > Office: 937-552-2340 > Direct: 937-552-2343 > 1100 Wayne St > Suite 1337 > Troy, OH 45373 > > On Jul 24, 2015 8:17 AM, "Paul Stewart" <[email protected]> wrote: > Well it will be interesting … sure would be nice to see someone “disrupt” I > agree … but there have been lots of folks try to provide “DPI” and fail badly > as they didn’t really understand what they were getting into… and doing it on > existing routers is usually the first mistake in my opinion….. > > > From: Af [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Jason McKemie > Sent: Friday, July 24, 2015 1:27 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Ubiquiti DPI? > > They've got the resources to do it, would be nice to see someone undercut the > existing players. > > On Thursday, July 23, 2015, Paul Stewart <[email protected]> wrote: > I have no idea but if it’s like other attempts I’ve seen from companies to > stack heavy CPU “stuff” into a router, then stability and any type of scaling > would be first concerns. DPI is a very complex item to see someone like > Ubiquiti jump into in my opinion… > > From: Af [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Jeremy > Sent: Thursday, July 23, 2015 7:13 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: [AFMUG] Ubiquiti DPI? > > Ok, so now that deep packet inspection has been announced I'd assume any NDAs > have been lifted. Have any of you been using this? Any idea what type of > latency is added? That pricing model is a whole lot different from any DPI > tool that I have ever seen....
