I think they have different teams on each project and some are more resource limited. they need to spend some more $$$$
Sent from my iPhone > On Jul 24, 2015, at 12:02 PM, Ken Hohhof <af...@kwisp.com> wrote: > > Now if they could just release the U-NII-1 firmware for the Beam products. > SOON! > > From: Jon Langeler > Sent: Friday, July 24, 2015 9:31 AM > To: af@afmug.com > Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Ubiquiti DPI? > > When you have the volume and variety of products that ubiquiti does, they can > do things that nobody else can do especially when they have some specialized > 3rd party developers. > > Sent from my iPhone > >> On Jul 24, 2015, at 8:52 AM, Ken Hohhof <af...@kwisp.com> wrote: >> >> My view is with DPI, like virus scanning or spam filtering, you are buying >> the updates as much as the platform. If the signatures and rules aren’t >> kept up to date, it loses value. Any vendor that uses this feature to sell >> hardware and doesn’t charge a yearly fee may not understand the task. >> >> >> From: Paul Stewart >> Sent: Friday, July 24, 2015 7:38 AM >> To: af@afmug.com >> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Ubiquiti DPI? >> >> LOL … I have a hard time with that term being used with Ubiquiti ;) >> >> >> >> From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Josh Luthman >> Sent: Friday, July 24, 2015 8:30 AM >> To: af@afmug.com >> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Ubiquiti DPI? >> >> >> >> "Carrier Grade" >> >> Josh Luthman >> Office: 937-552-2340 >> Direct: 937-552-2343 >> 1100 Wayne St >> Suite 1337 >> Troy, OH 45373 >> >> On Jul 24, 2015 8:17 AM, "Paul Stewart" <p...@paulstewart.org> wrote: >> >> Well it will be interesting … sure would be nice to see someone “disrupt” I >> agree … but there have been lots of folks try to provide “DPI” and fail >> badly as they didn’t really understand what they were getting into… and >> doing it on existing routers is usually the first mistake in my opinion….. >> >> >> >> >> >> From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Jason McKemie >> Sent: Friday, July 24, 2015 1:27 AM >> To: af@afmug.com >> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Ubiquiti DPI? >> >> >> >> They've got the resources to do it, would be nice to see someone undercut >> the existing players. >> >> On Thursday, July 23, 2015, Paul Stewart <p...@paulstewart.org> wrote: >> >> I have no idea but if it’s like other attempts I’ve seen from companies to >> stack heavy CPU “stuff” into a router, then stability and any type of >> scaling would be first concerns. DPI is a very complex item to see someone >> like Ubiquiti jump into in my opinion… >> >> >> >> From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Jeremy >> Sent: Thursday, July 23, 2015 7:13 PM >> To: af@afmug.com >> Subject: [AFMUG] Ubiquiti DPI? >> >> >> >> Ok, so now that deep packet inspection has been announced I'd assume any >> NDAs have been lifted. Have any of you been using this? Any idea what type >> of latency is added? That pricing model is a whole lot different from any >> DPI tool that I have ever seen....
