Oooh! Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Aug 8, 2015 6:03 PM, "Sriram Chaturvedi" < sriram.chaturv...@cambiumnetworks.com> wrote:
> FYI, A Beta release with 2.5ms frame support is available: > http://community.cambiumnetworks.com/t5/ePMP-Beta/ePMP-Beta-Release-2-5-RC10-is-now-available/m-p/42702#U42702 > > > It will be great to get some feedback on it. > > > Thanks, > > Sriram > > > ------------------------------ > *From:* Af <af-boun...@afmug.com> on behalf of Mathew Howard < > mhoward...@gmail.com> > *Sent:* Saturday, August 8, 2015 3:50 PM > *To:* af > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Is anyone here doing ePTP at all? > > +1 about. > > So I assume we'll see about half the current latency with 2.5 msec? I can > live with that for most links. > > On Sat, Aug 8, 2015 at 1:53 PM, Josh Luthman <j...@imaginenetworksllc.com> > wrote: > >> Thanks for the confirmation. And on a Saturday!!! >> >> >> Josh Luthman >> Office: 937-552-2340 >> Direct: 937-552-2343 >> 1100 Wayne St >> Suite 1337 >> Troy, OH 45373 >> >> On Sat, Aug 8, 2015 at 2:52 PM, Dan Sullivan < >> daniel.sulli...@cambiumnetworks.com> wrote: >> >>> 2.5 msec frame allows for sync and improves PTP latency as compared to 5 >>> msec frame. >>> >>> >>> >>> ePTP cannot be synced as communication is driven based on dynamic data >>> from each link. >>> >>> >>> Dan Sullivan >>> >>> ePMP Software Manager >>> >>> >>> >>> *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Mathew Howard >>> *Sent:* Saturday, August 08, 2015 10:11 AM >>> *To:* af >>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Is anyone here doing ePTP at all? >>> >>> >>> >>> Yep, I'm pretty sure it doesn't use fixed frames in ePTP mode... trying >>> to sync that sounds like it'd end up like airmax sync. >>> >>> 2.5ms frames make sync a lot more useful for ptp though. >>> >>> >>> >>> On Sat, Aug 8, 2015 at 7:06 AM, Josh Luthman < >>> j...@imaginenetworksllc.com> wrote: >>> >>> But that depends on frame timing which would leave you at the current >>> tdd ptp (5ms today, 2.5ms after 2.5). I'd love to see the 2ms latency be >>> synced but I don't see how that would be doable. >>> >>> Josh Luthman >>> Office: 937-552-2340 >>> Direct: 937-552-2343 >>> 1100 Wayne St >>> Suite 1337 >>> Troy, OH 45373 >>> >>> On Aug 8, 2015 7:54 AM, "Mike Hammett" <af...@ics-il.net> wrote: >>> >>> No, I mean exactly what I said ePTP sync. >>> >>> There's no reason that I'm aware of that the ePTP up\down cycles >>> couldn't be synced. The regular sync has to deal with potentially dozens of >>> clients. The ePTP just has to deal with one. >>> >>> >>> >>> ----- >>> Mike Hammett >>> Intelligent Computing Solutions >>> http://www.ics-il.com >>> >>> >>> ------------------------------ >>> >>> *From: *"Josh Luthman" <j...@imaginenetworksllc.com> >>> *To: *af@afmug.com >>> *Sent: *Saturday, August 8, 2015 6:48:14 AM >>> *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] Is anyone here doing ePTP at all? >>> >>> Eptp sync doesn't sound possible. That's what the tdd ptp is for. Do >>> you mean the 2.5ms timing? >>> >>> Josh Luthman >>> Office: 937-552-2340 >>> Direct: 937-552-2343 >>> 1100 Wayne St >>> Suite 1337 >>> Troy, OH 45373 >>> >>> On Aug 8, 2015 7:47 AM, "Mike Hammett" <af...@ics-il.net> wrote: >>> >>> Though* Early in the morning... >>> >>> >>> >>> ----- >>> Mike Hammett >>> Intelligent Computing Solutions >>> http://www.ics-il.com >>> >>> >>> ------------------------------ >>> >>> *From: *"Mike Hammett" <af...@ics-il.net> >>> *To: *af@afmug.com >>> *Sent: *Saturday, August 8, 2015 6:45:55 AM >>> *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] Is anyone here doing ePTP at all? >>> >>> Is it, thought? ;-) >>> >>> >>> FWIW, I have some ePTP up (eagerly awaiting ePTP sync!) and no issues >>> that I'm aware of. >>> >>> >>> >>> ----- >>> Mike Hammett >>> Intelligent Computing Solutions >>> http://www.ics-il.com >>> >>> >>> ------------------------------ >>> >>> *From: *"Josh Luthman" <j...@imaginenetworksllc.com> >>> *To: *af@afmug.com >>> *Sent: *Friday, August 7, 2015 4:41:45 PM >>> *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] Is anyone here doing ePTP at all? >>> >>> How long has it been up? According to Cambium I'm the only one that's >>> been experiencing a bug and it's all over the place. They've got a fix for >>> it but it's just so weird that I'm the only one with the problem =/ >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Josh Luthman >>> Office: 937-552-2340 >>> Direct: 937-552-2343 >>> 1100 Wayne St >>> Suite 1337 >>> Troy, OH 45373 >>> >>> >>> >>> On Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 5:32 PM, Mathew Howard <mhoward...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>> Yep, I just replaced a pair of NanoBridges with Force 110's doing ePTP a >>> couple days ago and we have at least one other. >>> >>> >>> >>> On Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 4:07 PM, Josh Luthman < >>> j...@imaginenetworksllc.com> wrote: >>> >>> Anyone at all? >>> >>> >>> >>> Josh Luthman >>> Office: 937-552-2340 >>> Direct: 937-552-2343 >>> 1100 Wayne St >>> Suite 1337 >>> Troy, OH 45373 >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> >