Good point, the damn thing is mounted to the same rack as the -48v unit
right now.  I believe the -48v unit is isolated from the rack, but I had
better make sure before I switch the Mikrotik over to DC power.

-Jason

On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 4:22 PM, <ch...@wbmfg.com> wrote:

> Set it on a cardboard box.  (With a sticky note warning not to touch
> case...)
>
> *From:* Jason McKemie <j.mcke...@veloxinetbroadband.com>
> *Sent:* Wednesday, August 19, 2015 3:11 PM
> *To:* af@afmug.com
> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Mixing +48v and -48v
>
> I'll probably just float the ground.
>
> On Wednesday, August 19, 2015, Josh Baird <joshba...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> They are hard to find.  Where will you ground the MT in this type of
>> scenario (with an RSD in between your -48V rectifier and MT)?
>>
>> Josh
>>
>> On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 11:31 PM, Jason McKemie <
>> javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','j.mcke...@veloxinetbroadband.com');> wrote:
>>
>>> It actually looks like the RSD-100C-24 should do the trick (I'm dropping
>>> to 24v, so I guess my subject line wasn't exactly correct).  My normal
>>> source is out of those, according to their website they have some
>>> RSD-200C-48 units though.
>>>
>>> On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 7:58 PM, George Skorup <
>>> javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','geo...@cbcast.com');> wrote:
>>>
>>>> The Mean Well RSD gives 4kV i/o isolation and will work perfectly this,
>>>> no grounding issues. I think the smallest you can get in 48/48 is 200W, the
>>>> RSD-200C-48. Good luck finding some.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 8/18/2015 7:20 PM, Jason McKemie wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I'm wanting to power a mikrotik switch off of a -48v rectifier setup
>>>>> that already has some -48v equipment running on it. I'll be using a
>>>>> Meanwell DC/DC converter, which appears to not bond anything with the
>>>>> ground. The mikrotik, however, does bond the negative with ground. Do I
>>>>> need to keep the mikrotik's ground isolated from the main ground? Or is 
>>>>> the
>>>>> DC/DC converter going to keep things from going boom?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>

Reply via email to