yes you are correct Mike, they are still missing the 54xx DFS channels. Faisal Imtiaz Snappy Internet & Telecom 7266 SW 48 Street Miami, FL 33155 Tel: 305 663 5518 x 232
Help-desk: (305)663-5518 Option 2 or Email: supp...@snappytelecom.net > From: "Mike Hammett" <af...@ics-il.net> > To: af@afmug.com > Sent: Sunday, August 23, 2015 4:49:11 PM > Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Cambium ePMP Feedback > IIRC, no new UBNT products have DFS certification. Some of the newer ones > (Maybe > all?) have 5150 certification. > ----- > Mike Hammett > Intelligent Computing Solutions > http://www.ics-il.com > Midwest Internet Exchange > http://www.midwest-ix.com > From: "Faisal Imtiaz" < fai...@snappytelecom.net > > To: af@afmug.com > Cc: "Principal WISPA Member List" < w...@wispa.org >, memb...@wispa.org > Sent: Sunday, August 23 , 2015 3:39:33 PM > Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Cambium ePMP Feedback > Hi Darin, > Comparing Ubnt AC to EPMP ... it is not a fair, apples to apples comparison.. > one is a 802.11ac based and the other is 802.11n based system. > in regards to certs... actually, both are now certified for all of the > bands... > EPMP is available for use today , Ubnt AC products, awaiting a new firmware to > unlock the channels. > ><I'm most interested in how ePMP scales on towers compared to UBNT > If you are feq. constrained, the re-use of freq with EPMP will be highly > desired. > If you are not freq. constrained then ability to do higher bandwidth with the > AC > products will be appealing. > >>>how it handles a low signal client better than UBNT when a dish gets > >>>misaligned > For all systems, irrespective of who makes them... the key factor is Signal to > Noise Ratio... if that is decent stuff will work well, if not then they all > come down to their knees.... How much and how quickly....would be very > difficult to describe....(kind of like asking someone what does a rose smell > like ?) >>>>Consistent jitter and ping is also something I'd be interested in hearing >>>>about > >>>to see how it handles VOIP and gaming better than UBNT. > On any GPS based system, you will have a higher ping time....(latency) > EPMP's have a very decent QOS mechanism, and voip works well . > Ubnt works pretty decent too. > However as a general rule.... non gps based systems are more susceptible to > interference... but then keep in mind that is a relative statement, depending > on the strength of the interfering signal, even the gps based units will come > down to their knees. > Faisal Imtiaz > Snappy Internet & Telecom > 7266 SW 48 Street > Miami, FL 33155 > Tel: 305 663 5518 x 232 > Help-desk: (305)663-5518 Option 2 or Email: supp...@snappytelecom.net >> From: "Darin Steffl" < darin.ste...@mnwifi.com > >> To: af@afmug.com , " memb...@wispa.org " < memb...@wispa.org >, "Principal >> WISPA >> Member List" < w...@wispa.org > >> Sent: Sunday, August 23 , 2015 1:52:40 PM >> Subject: [AFMUG] Cambium ePMP Feedback >> Hello guys, >> Have any of you used Ubiquiti M-Series and also used ePMP now to compare the >> differences in your network? We're building out some new sites and comparing >> Ubiquiti AC gear to ePMP and really would like to hear some more recent >> feedback on the ePMP platform since it always seems like it isn't talked >> about >> much on the list or in the forums. >> I know ePMP is fully certified for all bands while Ubiquiti is still only >> certified and running in the upper bands, except for beta which now has >> UNII-1 >> as well. I'm most interested in how ePMP scales on towers compared to UBNT >> and >> how it handles a low signal client better than UBNT when a dish gets >> misaligned. Consistent jitter and ping is also something I'd be interested in >> hearing about to see how it handles VOIP and gaming better than UBNT. >> Any feedback would be great. Thanks >> -- >> Darin Steffl >> Minnesota WiFi >> www.mnwifi.com >> 507-634-WiFi >> Like us on Facebook
