Same price. I'd rather go for one part to primarily stock. I've got 2 or 3 integrated in the shop to maybe 50? connectorized.
On top of that, I'd hope that Gino's sketch provides a more efficient illumination. Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 2:52 PM, Chuck McCown <ch...@wbmfg.com> wrote: > But you can put an integrated radio on our dishes. Isn’t the integrated > radio cheaper? > > *From:* Josh Luthman <j...@imaginenetworksllc.com> > *Sent:* Wednesday, September 16, 2015 12:47 PM > *To:* af@afmug.com > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Product Idea for Chuck - Feedback? > > Is it a new customer? Force 110 with a connectorized radio > Is it a new customer that wants a reflector? Use the connectorized radio > Is it a customer with Canopy+Dish? Use the connectorized radio > > Integrated radio would be for customers that are really close and could > hear multiple sectors. > > > Josh Luthman > Office: 937-552-2340 > Direct: 937-552-2343 > 1100 Wayne St > Suite 1337 > Troy, OH 45373 > > On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 2:41 PM, Chuck McCown <ch...@wbmfg.com> wrote: > >> But why would you want to use the connectorized radio vs the epmp? >> >> *From:* Josh Luthman <j...@imaginenetworksllc.com> >> *Sent:* Wednesday, September 16, 2015 12:39 PM >> *To:* af@afmug.com >> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Product Idea for Chuck - Feedback? >> >> >> Enabling you to use the reflectors already there and simply swap radios >> would be fantastic. I'm sure there are many going from FSK to epmp. >> >> Josh Luthman >> Office: 937-552-2340 >> Direct: 937-552-2343 >> 1100 Wayne St >> Suite 1337 >> Troy, OH 45373 >> On Sep 16, 2015 2:35 PM, "Chuck McCown" <ch...@wbmfg.com> wrote: >> >>> Oh, OK. I actually developed a small patch antenna for the >>> connectorized radio back when these first came out. I think it was for >>> you. Last winter or spring. >>> >>> The holdup was waiting for a tiny radome. I think I designed the >>> thermoform mold but never got any samples or something like that. Could >>> still finish that project I guess. >>> >>> *From:* Gino Villarini <ginovi...@gmail.com> >>> *Sent:* Wednesday, September 16, 2015 11:49 AM >>> *To:* af@afmug.com >>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Product Idea for Chuck - Feedback? >>> >>> just to clarify, we DO NOT want a epmp integrated holder! check the >>> sketch >>> >>> On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 1:29 PM, Chuck McCown <ch...@wbmfg.com> wrote: >>> >>>> We can do this. Whose dish and what frequency? >>>> We have a holder now for ePMP for our current dishes. It fits some of >>>> the others I think. >>>> >>>> Our older dishes had a D tube with a piece of bent conduit welded into >>>> it. The SM snapped into place. Hard to do some thing for them. >>>> >>>> Later we had the rectangular tubing with the claw snap fit. Our >>>> current ePMP holder should work with those. >>>> >>>> *From:* Gino Villarini <ginovi...@gmail.com> >>>> *Sent:* Wednesday, September 16, 2015 11:17 AM >>>> *To:* af@afmug.com >>>> *Subject:* [AFMUG] Product Idea for Chuck - Feedback? >>>> >>>> Chuck >>>> >>>> As we migrate Canopy to epmp, we find ourselves wishing for this: >>>> >>>> -Epmp holder for conn. epmp radio with illumination feedhorn for >>>> traditional dishes >>>> >>>> The idea would be that instead of replacing the whole canopy radio+dish >>>> with a Force110 unit, it would be more efficient to just remove the Canopy >>>> radio and reuse the dish with a conn. radio >>>> >>>> I think that we could pay $25-$30 for something like this. >>>> >>> >>> >> >
