Yes.  Yes, plus the realign.

Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373

On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 4:04 PM, Adam Moffett <dmmoff...@gmail.com> wrote:

> The PoE is compatible right?  Does it take more than 5 minutes to swap
> dishes?
>
>
> On 9/16/2015 3:35 PM, Gino Villarini wrote:
>
> Also, the patch on the integrated epmp does not provide a good
> illumination to the Canopy Dish,  What we need is the same patch that the
> 450 has... it works with all canopy dishes in the market...  if we can
> achieve 23db gain,, it would be awesome!
>
> Many people will migrate from FSK to EPMP and the current process is not
> efficient at all
>
> On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 2:52 PM, Chuck McCown <ch...@wbmfg.com> wrote:
>
>> But you can put an integrated radio on our dishes.  Isn’t the integrated
>> radio cheaper?
>>
>> *From:* Josh Luthman <j...@imaginenetworksllc.com>
>> *Sent:* Wednesday, September 16, 2015 12:47 PM
>> *To:* af@afmug.com
>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Product Idea for Chuck - Feedback?
>>
>> Is it a new customer?  Force 110 with a connectorized radio
>> Is it a new customer that wants a reflector?  Use the connectorized radio
>> Is it a customer with Canopy+Dish?  Use the connectorized radio
>>
>> Integrated radio would be for customers that are really close and could
>> hear multiple sectors.
>>
>>
>> Josh Luthman
>> Office: 937-552-2340
>> Direct: 937-552-2343
>> 1100 Wayne St
>> Suite 1337
>> Troy, OH 45373
>>
>> On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 2:41 PM, Chuck McCown < <ch...@wbmfg.com>
>> ch...@wbmfg.com> wrote:
>>
>>> But why would you want to use the connectorized radio vs the epmp?
>>>
>>> *From:* Josh Luthman <j...@imaginenetworksllc.com>
>>> *Sent:* Wednesday, September 16, 2015 12:39 PM
>>> *To:* <af@afmug.com>af@afmug.com
>>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Product Idea for Chuck - Feedback?
>>>
>>>
>>> Enabling you to use the reflectors already there and simply swap radios
>>> would be fantastic.  I'm sure there are many going from FSK to epmp.
>>>
>>> Josh Luthman
>>> Office: 937-552-2340
>>> Direct: 937-552-2343
>>> 1100 Wayne St
>>> Suite 1337
>>> Troy, OH 45373
>>> On Sep 16, 2015 2:35 PM, "Chuck McCown" < <ch...@wbmfg.com>
>>> ch...@wbmfg.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Oh, OK.  I actually developed a small patch antenna for the
>>>> connectorized radio back when these first came out.  I think it was for
>>>> you.    Last winter or spring.
>>>>
>>>> The holdup was waiting for a tiny radome.  I think I designed the
>>>> thermoform mold but never got any samples or something like that.  Could
>>>> still finish that project I guess.
>>>>
>>>> *From:* Gino Villarini <ginovi...@gmail.com>
>>>> *Sent:* Wednesday, September 16, 2015 11:49 AM
>>>> *To:* <af@afmug.com>af@afmug.com
>>>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Product Idea for Chuck - Feedback?
>>>>
>>>> just to clarify, we DO NOT want a epmp integrated holder! check the
>>>> sketch
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 1:29 PM, Chuck McCown < <ch...@wbmfg.com>
>>>> ch...@wbmfg.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> We can do this.  Whose dish and what frequency?
>>>>> We have a holder now for ePMP for our current dishes.  It fits some of
>>>>> the others I think.
>>>>>
>>>>> Our older dishes had a D tube with a piece of bent conduit welded into
>>>>> it.  The SM snapped into place.  Hard to do some thing for them.
>>>>>
>>>>> Later we had the rectangular tubing with the claw snap fit.  Our
>>>>> current ePMP holder should work with those.
>>>>>
>>>>> *From:* Gino Villarini <ginovi...@gmail.com>
>>>>> *Sent:* Wednesday, September 16, 2015 11:17 AM
>>>>> *To:* <af@afmug.com>af@afmug.com
>>>>> *Subject:* [AFMUG] Product Idea for Chuck - Feedback?
>>>>>
>>>>> Chuck
>>>>>
>>>>> As we migrate Canopy to epmp, we find ourselves wishing for this:
>>>>>
>>>>> -Epmp holder for conn. epmp radio with illumination feedhorn for
>>>>> traditional dishes
>>>>>
>>>>> The idea would be that instead of replacing the whole canopy
>>>>> radio+dish with a Force110 unit, it would be more efficient to just remove
>>>>> the Canopy radio and reuse the dish with a conn. radio
>>>>>
>>>>> I think that we could pay $25-$30 for something like this.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
>

Reply via email to