I do it the same as you, but what he's saying makes sense just fine to me... probably the hangover :P
I don't see that there's really any big advantage to doing it one way or the other, but it seems a bit simpler to me to not have to deal with vlans. On Sun, Sep 27, 2015 at 1:16 PM, Mike Hammett <af...@ics-il.net> wrote: > Maybe it's the hangover I have from the wedding I was at yesterday, but > what you're saying doesn't make any sense. This is what I do: > > 10.1.255.0/29 > .1 Router A > .2 Radio A > .5 Radio B > .6 Router B > > > > ----- > Mike Hammett > Intelligent Computing Solutions > http://www.ics-il.com > > ------------------------------ > *From: *"Eric Kuhnke" <eric.kuh...@gmail.com> > *To: *af@afmug.com > *Sent: *Saturday, September 26, 2015 6:17:44 PM > > *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] ospf issues with pbe-5ac-500 not passing > > umm, no? Even with radios that have only one cable like the powerbeam, > use a /30 for OSPF. Have the radios listen on a separate VLAN for > management traffic on a unique management IP... for example each unique > physical site might use vlan60 for radio management and have a /28 of > private space in 10/8 space. The first usable IP in the /28 is used for the > gateway, then start numbering your radios starting from the second usable > IP. > > On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 8:09 PM, Mike Hammett <af...@ics-il.net> wrote: > >> Not when you have two radios to manage in the middle. >> >> >> >> ----- >> Mike Hammett >> Intelligent Computing Solutions >> http://www.ics-il.com >> >> ------------------------------ >> *From: *"Eric Kuhnke" <eric.kuh...@gmail.com> >> *To: *af@afmug.com >> *Sent: *Friday, September 25, 2015 7:25:12 PM >> >> *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] ospf issues with pbe-5ac-500 not passing >> >> An OSPF PTP link between two routers is usually configured as a /30 , no? >> >> What are your MTU and other settings on the interfaces on both sides? >> Other things like CDP , LDP? >> On Sep 25, 2015 4:56 PM, "Tim Reichhart" <timreichh...@hometowncable.net> >> wrote: >> >>> Mathew >>> I am running my links in PTP mode but I am splitting my backhauls in /29 >>> on each interface I dont know if that would cause any problems. >>> >>> Tim >>> >>> ------------------------------ >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: "Mathew Howard" <mhoward...@gmail.com> >>> To: af <af@afmug.com> >>> Date: 09/25/15 11:03 AM >>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ospf issues with pbe-5ac-500 not passing >>> >>> I didn't do anything - they just worked. Are you running them in PTP >>> mode, or PTMP? >>> >>> >>> On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 7:27 AM, Tim Reichhart < >>> timreichh...@hometowncable.net> wrote: >>> >>>> Mathew >>>> please tell me how you got it to work because me and justin wilson is >>>> having hell of time getting my backhaul link to pass the ospf. >>>> >>>> Tim >>>> >>>> ------------------------------ >>>> -----Original Message----- >>>> From: "That One Guy /sarcasm" <thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> >>>> To: af@afmug.com >>>> Date: 09/25/15 12:52 AM >>>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ospf issues with pbe-5ac-500 not passing >>>> >>>> that makes sense >>>> >>>> On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 11:38 PM, Peter Kranz <pkr...@unwiredltd.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Links by default now run under WDS.. So they removed the ability to >>>>> disable it. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -PK >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of* That One Guy >>>>> /sarcasm >>>>> *Sent:* Thursday, September 24, 2015 9:27 PM >>>>> *To:* af@afmug.com >>>>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] ospf issues with pbe-5ac-500 not passing >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> I'm poking at eoip tunnels with ospf inside >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> why did they remove wds? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 10:11 PM, George Skorup <geo...@cbcast.com> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> I don't have any of the ac radios, only M. Does it have Multicast Data >>>>> - Allow All (check box)? If that's unchecked, then multicast will not be >>>>> allowed over the RF interface, thus OSPF (which is multicast) will not >>>>> work. >>>>> >>>>> Other than that, are you sure you have MT OSPF configured correctly? >>>>> If not that, then I have no idea. Kick it in the pants? >>>>> >>>>> On 9/24/2015 9:58 PM, Tim Reichhart wrote: >>>>> >>>>> so if the multicast filtering can cause ospf not to work correctly? >>>>> Even there is no option for wds on the newer firmware? >>>>> >>>>> Tim >>>>> >>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>> >>>>> From: "George Skorup" <geo...@cbcast.com> >>>>> To: af@afmug.com >>>>> Date: 09/24/15 10:53 PM >>>>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ospf issues with pbe-5ac-500 not passing >>>>> >>>>> Does this new 11ac stuff have multicast filtering like the M series? I >>>>> think it's on the advanced tab. I made that mistake once. >>>>> >>>>> On 9/24/2015 9:44 PM, Rhys Cuff (Latrobe I.T) wrote: >>>>> >>>>> I find you need WDS enabled >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>> From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Tim Reichhart >>>>> Sent: Friday, 25 September 2015 12:32 PM >>>>> To: af@afmug.com >>>>> Subject: [AFMUG] ospf issues with pbe-5ac-500 not passing >>>>> >>>>> I am having an weird issues with my PowerBeam 5AC 500 with ospf >>>>> traffic not passing through and I am using these PowerBeam 5AC 500 as >>>>> backhauls and they are connected to mikrotik. I am running firmware >>>>> 7.1.4xc >>>>> and not doing nbma setup. >>>>> >>>>> Tim >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> >>>>> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your >>>>> team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your >>>> team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >> > >
