That's exactly what I do. Per physical site with a router that speaks BGP+OSPF+MPLS, all radios have their own management /28 which is in its own VLAN, inside 10/8 RFC1918 IP space.
On Sun, Sep 27, 2015 at 11:29 AM, Ken Hohhof <af...@kwisp.com> wrote: > Couldn’t you assign a /30 for router-router and OSPF, and a secondary > /whatever for managing the radios? Especially if you need to have public > IPs for the router interfaces. > > > *From:* Mathew Howard <mhoward...@gmail.com> > *Sent:* Sunday, September 27, 2015 1:25 PM > *To:* af <af@afmug.com> > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] ospf issues with pbe-5ac-500 not passing > > I do it the same as you, but what he's saying makes sense just fine to > me... probably the hangover :P > > I don't see that there's really any big advantage to doing it one way or > the other, but it seems a bit simpler to me to not have to deal with vlans. > > On Sun, Sep 27, 2015 at 1:16 PM, Mike Hammett <af...@ics-il.net> wrote: > >> Maybe it's the hangover I have from the wedding I was at yesterday, but >> what you're saying doesn't make any sense. This is what I do: >> >> 10.1.255.0/29 >> .1 Router A >> .2 Radio A >> .5 Radio B >> .6 Router B >> >> >> >> ----- >> Mike Hammett >> Intelligent Computing Solutions >> http://www.ics-il.com >> >> ------------------------------ >> *From: *"Eric Kuhnke" <eric.kuh...@gmail.com> >> *To: *af@afmug.com >> *Sent: *Saturday, September 26, 2015 6:17:44 PM >> >> *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] ospf issues with pbe-5ac-500 not passing >> >> umm, no? Even with radios that have only one cable like the powerbeam, >> use a /30 for OSPF. Have the radios listen on a separate VLAN for >> management traffic on a unique management IP... for example each unique >> physical site might use vlan60 for radio management and have a /28 of >> private space in 10/8 space. The first usable IP in the /28 is used for the >> gateway, then start numbering your radios starting from the second usable >> IP. >> >> On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 8:09 PM, Mike Hammett <af...@ics-il.net> wrote: >> >>> Not when you have two radios to manage in the middle. >>> >>> >>> >>> ----- >>> Mike Hammett >>> Intelligent Computing Solutions >>> http://www.ics-il.com >>> >>> ------------------------------ >>> *From: *"Eric Kuhnke" <eric.kuh...@gmail.com> >>> *To: *af@afmug.com >>> *Sent: *Friday, September 25, 2015 7:25:12 PM >>> >>> *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] ospf issues with pbe-5ac-500 not passing >>> >>> An OSPF PTP link between two routers is usually configured as a /30 , no? >>> >>> What are your MTU and other settings on the interfaces on both sides? >>> Other things like CDP , LDP? >>> On Sep 25, 2015 4:56 PM, "Tim Reichhart" <timreichh...@hometowncable.net> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Mathew >>>> I am running my links in PTP mode but I am splitting my backhauls in >>>> /29 on each interface I dont know if that would cause any problems. >>>> >>>> Tim >>>> >>>> ------------------------------ >>>> -----Original Message----- >>>> From: "Mathew Howard" <mhoward...@gmail.com> >>>> To: af <af@afmug.com> >>>> Date: 09/25/15 11:03 AM >>>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ospf issues with pbe-5ac-500 not passing >>>> >>>> I didn't do anything - they just worked. Are you running them in PTP >>>> mode, or PTMP? >>>> >>>> >>>> On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 7:27 AM, Tim Reichhart < >>>> timreichh...@hometowncable.net> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Mathew >>>>> please tell me how you got it to work because me and justin wilson is >>>>> having hell of time getting my backhaul link to pass the ospf. >>>>> >>>>> Tim >>>>> >>>>> ------------------------------ >>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>> From: "That One Guy /sarcasm" <thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> >>>>> To: af@afmug.com >>>>> Date: 09/25/15 12:52 AM >>>>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ospf issues with pbe-5ac-500 not passing >>>>> >>>>> that makes sense >>>>> >>>>> On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 11:38 PM, Peter Kranz <pkr...@unwiredltd.com> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Links by default now run under WDS.. So they removed the ability to >>>>>> disable it. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -PK >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of* That One Guy >>>>>> /sarcasm >>>>>> *Sent:* Thursday, September 24, 2015 9:27 PM >>>>>> *To:* af@afmug.com >>>>>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] ospf issues with pbe-5ac-500 not passing >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> I'm poking at eoip tunnels with ospf inside >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> why did they remove wds? >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 10:11 PM, George Skorup <geo...@cbcast.com> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> I don't have any of the ac radios, only M. Does it have Multicast >>>>>> Data - Allow All (check box)? If that's unchecked, then multicast will >>>>>> not >>>>>> be allowed over the RF interface, thus OSPF (which is multicast) will not >>>>>> work. >>>>>> >>>>>> Other than that, are you sure you have MT OSPF configured correctly? >>>>>> If not that, then I have no idea. Kick it in the pants? >>>>>> >>>>>> On 9/24/2015 9:58 PM, Tim Reichhart wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> so if the multicast filtering can cause ospf not to work correctly? >>>>>> Even there is no option for wds on the newer firmware? >>>>>> >>>>>> Tim >>>>>> >>>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>>> >>>>>> From: "George Skorup" <geo...@cbcast.com> >>>>>> To: af@afmug.com >>>>>> Date: 09/24/15 10:53 PM >>>>>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ospf issues with pbe-5ac-500 not passing >>>>>> >>>>>> Does this new 11ac stuff have multicast filtering like the M series? I >>>>>> think it's on the advanced tab. I made that mistake once. >>>>>> >>>>>> On 9/24/2015 9:44 PM, Rhys Cuff (Latrobe I.T) wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> I find you need WDS enabled >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>>> From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Tim Reichhart >>>>>> Sent: Friday, 25 September 2015 12:32 PM >>>>>> To: af@afmug.com >>>>>> Subject: [AFMUG] ospf issues with pbe-5ac-500 not passing >>>>>> >>>>>> I am having an weird issues with my PowerBeam 5AC 500 with ospf >>>>>> traffic not passing through and I am using these PowerBeam 5AC 500 as >>>>>> backhauls and they are connected to mikrotik. I am running firmware >>>>>> 7.1.4xc >>>>>> and not doing nbma setup. >>>>>> >>>>>> Tim >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> >>>>>> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your >>>>>> team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your >>>>> team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >> >> >> > >
